From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:49:23 -0700The kernel should be able to do this transparently, at the very least for the anonymous page case. It should also be able to handle just fine chips that provide multiple page size support, as many do. --
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3 |
git: | |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept |
| Dan McGee | Re: I don't want the .git directory next to my code. |
| Wink Saville | Resolving conflicts |
| walt | git versus CVS (versus bk) |
| Wolfgang Thiel | mtools |
| pete cervasio | Re: Splitting comp.os.linux |
| BILES, GREG THOMAS | mtools |
| Robert L. Mcmillin | Re: Splitting comp.os.lin |
| Richard Wilson | OpenBSD in the webcomic XKCD |
| David Newman | setting dscp or tos bits |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Edwin Eyan Moragas | poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance |
