Hi!

quoted text
> Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: resize NR_IRQS for large machines
> 
> From: Alan Mayer <ajm@sgi.com>
> 
> On machines with very large numbers of cpus, tables that are dimensioned
> by NR_IRQS get very large, especially the irq_desc table.  They are also
> very sparsely used.  When the cpu count is > MAX_IO_APICS, use MAX_IO_APICS
> to set NR_IRQS, otherwise use NR_CPUS.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Mayer <ajm@sgi.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

quoted text
> ===================================================================
> --- v2.6.25-rc6.orig/include/asm-x86/irq_64.h	2008-03-19 16:52:52.000000000 -0500
> +++ v2.6.25-rc6/include/asm-x86/irq_64.h	2008-03-20 16:46:51.000000000 -0500
> @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
>   *	<tomsoft@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
>   */
>  
> +#if !defined(MAX_IO_APICS)
> +#include <asm/apicdef.h>
> +#endif
> +

This is very ugly. Why not include it unconditionally -- with guard in
apicdef.h?
							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/