RE: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dean Nelson <dcn@...>, <jes@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-ia64@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 - 6:49 pm

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:25:24PM -0500, dcn@sgi.com wrote:

Part 2 (which I got since you addressed it to me directly as well as
to the list) has a couple of "Space in indent is follwed by a tab"
complaints from GIT.  Part 3 has one too.  Apart from that all five
parts apply and the build is clean on all my configs.  Boots on the
tiger (but this doesn't constitute a review ... just a "you didn't
break anything unrelated while making this change").


I think git has an option to produce its own brand of diff output
that lists the renames without doing a full remove & add which is
needed for patch(1) comprehensibility.  A few minutes staring at
git documentation hasn't revealed what that option is though :-(

For purposes of getting someone to review ... you could hand edit
to show the renames as:

	$ mv arch/ia64/sn/kernel/xpc_channel.c drivers/misc/xp/xpc_channel.c
		... etc.

and just include the diffs for the Makefiles, Kconfig etc.

Or break part 2 into:

	2a - remove driver from arch/ia64
	2b - add driver to drivers/misc/xp

-Tony
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
RE: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV, Luck, Tony, (Tue Mar 25, 6:49 pm)
Re: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV, Andreas Schwab, (Tue Mar 25, 7:04 pm)