Hello, Here there is a series of 20 patches that lays the foundations for using dma_ops in i386 in the very same way x86_64, as well as many other architectures already do. The functions themselves for i386 are placed in a pci-base_32.c, but just a few among them are actually implemented. Most were no-ops anyway. Also, as I said, this is by no means a complete coverage of dma_ops. there are still some call sites to be patches in pci-dma_32.c (although I don't really plan to change them, but to integrate them in a single pci-dma.c). I intend to have it done progressively. The granularity is per-operation, meaning each patch moves one specific function to the common header. This is compiled-tested in both i386 and x86_64 in ~5 randconfigs each, and boot-tested in my hardware with my default configs The motivation for that is the ongoing work for pci-passthrough in KVM. So ingo, avi, what do you think it's the best way to handle these patches through? Thanks --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 |
| Eric Paris | [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
