Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Thomas Meyer
Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 - 2:08 pm

Ingo Molnar schrieb:
See file attachments of this bug:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10080

and compare lspci -vv from 2.6.25 and 2.6.24:

2.6.25:
0c:03.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Agere Systems FW323 (rev 61) (prog-if 10 
[OHCI])
    Subsystem: Agere Systems FW323
    Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B+ DisINTx-
    Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- 
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
    Latency: 248 (3000ns min, 6000ns max), Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
    Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19
    Region 0: [virtual] Memory at 100000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) 
[size=4K]
    Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
        Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
        Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
    Kernel driver in use: ohci1394
    Kernel modules: firewire-ohci, ohci1394

2.6.24:
0c:03.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Agere Systems FW323 (rev 61) (prog-if 10 
[OHCI])
    Subsystem: Agere Systems FW323
    Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop- ParErr- 
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B+ DisINTx-
    Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- 
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
    Latency: 248 (3000ns min, 6000ns max), Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
    Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 19
    Region 0: Memory at 8c000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
    Capabilities: [44] Power Management version 2
        Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA 
PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold-)
        Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME+
    Kernel driver in use: ohci1394
    Kernel modules: firewire-ohci, ohci1394
Maybe. Is it important that i have an core duo? (32 bit only - not a the 
core *2* duo)?
Is the lspci output sufficient for you?

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Mar 21, 6:59 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Mar 21, 7:52 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 21, 10:33 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 22, 4:11 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 22, 4:15 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Heiko Carstens, (Sat Mar 22, 9:32 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 22, 10:53 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 22, 10:56 am)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: R ..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 22, 10:58 am)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: R ..., Thomas Meyer, (Tue Mar 25, 2:08 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: R ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Mar 25, 4:33 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: R ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Mar 25, 5:12 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: R ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Mar 25, 8:39 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: R ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 5:17 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Mar 26, 10:02 am)
Re: [patch] pci: revert &quot;PCI: remove transparent bridge si ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 2:57 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Mar 26, 3:11 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert &quot;PCI: remove transparent bridge si ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 3:27 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert &quot;PCI: remove transparent bridge si ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 3:29 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert &quot;PCI: remove transparent bridge si ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 3:54 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert &quot;PCI: remove transparent bridge si ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 4:17 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert &quot;PCI: remove transparent bridge si ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 4:18 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: R ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 4:25 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert &quot;PCI: remove transparent bridge si ..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 4:45 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Romano Giannetti, (Thu Mar 27, 3:18 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Mar 31, 11:21 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Tino Keitel, (Mon Mar 31, 2:04 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Tino Keitel, (Mon Mar 31, 2:26 pm)
2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Thu Apr 3, 12:06 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Fri Apr 4, 7:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 3:51 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Mon Apr 7, 8:51 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 10:40 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Tue Apr 8, 8:35 am)