Re: [PATCH] x86: pat cpu feature bit setting for known cpus

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, kernel list <linux-kernel@...>, <suresh.b.siddha@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 - 4:08 pm

* Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> wrote:


well, the upside would be that since most testing of Linux kernels is 
done on _old_ hardware (people tend to risk their old hw first ;-), we'd 
get faster convergence of the codebase, even though we have the risk of 
erratas (known and unknown ones alike). Code that artificially limits 
its utility is almost always slow to stabilize.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: pat cpu feature bit setting for known cpus, Venki Pallipadi, (Tue Mar 25, 3:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: pat cpu feature bit setting for known cpus, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 25, 4:08 pm)
RE: [PATCH] x86: pat cpu feature bit setting for known cpus, Pallipadi, Venkatesh, (Tue Mar 25, 7:38 pm)