Am Dienstag, 25. März 2008 15:33:22 schrieb Alan Stern:
quoted text > > so I'd say a
> > failure to resume is just a limited subcase of a device vanishing during
> > sleep.
>
> I'll go along with that. If a device vanishes during sleep, the PM
> core isn't responsible for unregistering it -- the device's subsystem
> is.
Yes, that makes sense. You are right.
Regards
Oliver
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH] PM: Introduce new top level , Oliver Neukum , (Tue Mar 25, 3:48 pm)