Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> writes:Right. Perhaps I should care a bit more about the stable series... Sure. Well, there was something like "minimal testing", and it doesn't panic 100% like the old code does. But the probability that it won't work correctly is quite high. IOW: the new version is certainly better than the old one, though it's not the normal quality (in terms of testing) I'd like to see. Actually Frame Relay and other protocols are not affected, the PPP patch doesn't change them a bit, it's a different module. The new code only affect PPP protocol. I'm fine with the Kconfig patch, actually I'm not sure what is better at this time - a known broken module marked as such or a new module with some small chances that it will crash the machine and with much bigger chances that it won't work with a certain PPP implementation on the other end. Something like that? Untested :-) Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl> --- a/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig @@ -150,9 +150,13 @@ config HDLC_FR config HDLC_PPP tristate "Synchronous Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) support" - depends on HDLC + depends on HDLC && BROKEN help Generic HDLC driver supporting PPP over WAN connections. + This module is currently broken and will cause a kernel panic + when a device configured in PPP mode is activated. + + It will be replaced by new PPP implementation in Linux 2.6.26. If unsure, say N. --
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
