login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
March
»
25
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Balbir Singh <balbir@...>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...>
Cc: <linux-mm@...>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>, Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...>, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...>, Paul Menage <menage@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <taka@...>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...>
Subject:
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
Date: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 - 11:48 am
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
quoted text
> > Balbir Singh wrote: > > This patch removes the mem_cgroup member from mm_struct and instead adds > > an owner. This approach was suggested by Paul Menage. The advantage of > > this approach is that, once the mm->owner is known, using the subsystem > > id, the cgroup can be determined. It also allows several control groups > > that are virtually grouped by mm_struct, to exist independent of the memory > > controller i.e., without adding mem_cgroup's for each controller, > > to mm_struct. > > > > The code initially assigns mm->owner to the task and then after the > > thread group leader is identified. The mm->owner is changed to the thread > > group leader of the task later at the end of copy_process. > > > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > --- > > > > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 14 +++++++++++++- > > include/linux/mm_types.h | 5 ++++- > > kernel/fork.c | 4 ++++ > > mm/memcontrol.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > > 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff -puN include/linux/mm_types.h~memory-controller-add-mm-owner include/linux/mm_types.h > > --- linux-2.6.25-rc5/include/linux/mm_types.h~memory-controller-add-mm-owner 2008-03-20 13:35:09.000000000 +0530 > > +++ linux-2.6.25-rc5-balbir/include/linux/mm_types.h 2008-03-20 15:11:05.000000000 +0530 > > @@ -228,7 +228,10 @@ struct mm_struct { > > rwlock_t ioctx_list_lock; > > struct kioctx *ioctx_list; > > #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR > > - struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup; > > + struct task_struct *owner; /* The thread group leader that */ > > + /* owns the mm_struct. This */ > > + /* might be useful even outside */ > > + /* of the config option */ > > #endif > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > > diff -puN kernel/fork.c~memory-controller-add-mm-owner kernel/fork.c > > --- linux-2.6.25-rc5/kernel/fork.c~memory-controller-add-mm-owner 2008-03-20 13:35:09.000000000 +0530 > > +++ linux-2.6.25-rc5-balbir/kernel/fork.c 2008-03-24 18:49:29.000000000 +0530 > > @@ -1357,6 +1357,10 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process( > > write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock); > > proc_fork_connector(p); > > cgroup_post_fork(p); > > + > > + if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) > > + mem_cgroup_fork_init(p); > > + > > return p; > > > > bad_fork_free_pid: > > diff -puN include/linux/memcontrol.h~memory-controller-add-mm-owner include/linux/memcontrol.h > > --- linux-2.6.25-rc5/include/linux/memcontrol.h~memory-controller-add-mm-owner 2008-03-20 13:35:09.000000000 +0530 > > +++ linux-2.6.25-rc5-balbir/include/linux/memcontrol.h 2008-03-24 18:49:52.000000000 +0530 > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct mm_struct; > > > > extern void mm_init_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p); > > extern void mm_free_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm); > > +extern void mem_cgroup_fork_init(struct task_struct *p); > > > > #define page_reset_bad_cgroup(page) ((page)->page_cgroup = 0) > > > > @@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(str > > int task_in_mem_cgroup(struct task_struct *task, const struct mem_cgroup *mem); > > > > #define mm_match_cgroup(mm, cgroup) \ > > - ((cgroup) == rcu_dereference((mm)->mem_cgroup)) > > + ((cgroup) == mem_cgroup_from_task((mm)->owner)) > > > > extern int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page); > > extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page); > > @@ -72,6 +73,8 @@ extern long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim_acti > > extern long mem_cgroup_calc_reclaim_inactive(struct mem_cgroup *mem, > > struct zone *zone, int priority); > > > > +extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p); > > + > > #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */ > > static inline void mm_init_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm, > > struct task_struct *p) > > @@ -82,6 +85,10 @@ static inline void mm_free_cgroup(struct > > { > > } > > > > +static inline void mem_cgroup_fork_init(struct task_struct *p) > > +{ > > +} > > + > > static inline void page_reset_bad_cgroup(struct page *page) > > { > > } > > @@ -172,6 +179,11 @@ static inline long mem_cgroup_calc_recla > > { > > return 0; > > } > > + > > +static void mm_free_fork_cgroup(struct task_struct *p) > > +{ > > +} > > + > > Where is this function used? I don't see the corresponding one > with CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR enabled? >
I kept that as a template for freeing up code. I'll remove that since it is additional code
quoted text
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT */ > > > > #endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */ > > diff -puN mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-add-mm-owner mm/memcontrol.c > > --- linux-2.6.25-rc5/mm/memcontrol.c~memory-controller-add-mm-owner 2008-03-20 13:35:09.000000000 +0530 > > +++ linux-2.6.25-rc5-balbir/mm/memcontrol.c 2008-03-24 19:04:32.000000000 +0530 > > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_fro > > css); > > } > > > > -static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p) > > +struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_task(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > return container_of(task_subsys_state(p, mem_cgroup_subsys_id), > > struct mem_cgroup, css); > > @@ -248,12 +248,40 @@ void mm_init_cgroup(struct mm_struct *mm > > > > mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(p); > > css_get(&mem->css); > > - mm->mem_cgroup = mem; > > + mm->owner = p; > > +} > > + > > +void mem_cgroup_fork_init(struct task_struct *p) > > +{ > > + struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(p); > > + struct mem_cgroup *mem, *oldmem; > > Leave an empty line here. >
OK Thanks for the review Balbir --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Balbir Singh
, (Mon Mar 24, 10:01 am)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Li Zefan
, (Mon Mar 24, 9:26 pm)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Balbir Singh
, (Tue Mar 25, 11:48 am)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Paul Menage
, (Mon Mar 24, 11:03 am)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Balbir Singh
, (Mon Mar 24, 12:21 pm)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Paul Menage
, (Mon Mar 24, 12:34 pm)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Balbir Singh
, (Mon Mar 24, 1:33 pm)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Paul Menage
, (Mon Mar 24, 1:46 pm)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Balbir Singh
, (Tue Mar 25, 7:41 am)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Balbir Singh
, (Wed Mar 26, 6:29 am)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Paul Menage
, (Wed Mar 26, 7:20 am)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Balbir Singh
, (Wed Mar 26, 7:41 am)
Re: [RFC][-mm] Memory controller add mm->owner
, Paul Menage
, (Wed Mar 26, 11:21 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.21-rc4
Jens Axboe
[PATCH 0/8] IO queuing and complete affinity
Nicholas A. Bellinger
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Robin Lee Powell
NFS hang + umount -f: better behaviour requested.
git
:
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Ingo Molnar
Re: [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000...
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 19/37] dccp: Header option insertion routine for feature-negotiation
Gary Thomas
Marvell 88E609x switch?
linux-fsdevel
:
Jamie Lokier
Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
Jan Kara
[PATCH 10/16] ext4: Remove syncing logic from ext4_file_write
Jack Stone
Re: Versioning file system
Jens Axboe
[PATCH 8/8] vm: Add an tuning knob for vm.max_writeback_pages
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
2 users
and
870 guests
online.
Online users
ernestot1
alpha_one_x86
Syndicate