On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:Hi, I'd like some clarification about the future (use) of linux-next and Andrew's -mm patch series. They duplicate a lot of the major git tree or quilt patch series. Can we expect both of them to continue as is or will -mm be a patch series on top of linux-next or what? -- ~Randy --
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [00/17] Large Blocksize Support V3 |
| Thomas Gleixner | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc4 |
git: | |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: [PATCH] RFC: git lazy clone proof-of-concept |
| Dan McGee | Re: I don't want the .git directory next to my code. |
| Wink Saville | Resolving conflicts |
| walt | git versus CVS (versus bk) |
| pete cervasio | Re: Splitting comp.os.linux |
| Wolfgang Thiel | mtools |
| BILES, GREG THOMAS | mtools |
| Robert L. Mcmillin | Re: Splitting comp.os.lin |
| Richard Wilson | OpenBSD in the webcomic XKCD |
| David Newman | setting dscp or tos bits |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Edwin Eyan Moragas | poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance |
