On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, David Miller wrote:Its certainly not a light decision if your customer tells you that the box is almost unusable with 16k page size. For our new 2k and 4k processor systems this seems to be a requirement. Customers start hacking SLES10 to run with 64k pages.... Well yes if you would use such a box for kernel compiles and small files then its a bad move. However, if you have to process terabytes of data then this is significantly reducing the VM and I/O overhead. powerpc also runs HPC codes. They certainly see the same results that we see. --
| Matthew Garrett | [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Adrian Bunk | If you want me to quit I will quit |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [RFC PATCH 05/26] UBIFS: add file-system build |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Andy Whitcroft | Re: VCS comparison table |
| franky | Is there any plan to support partial checkout or submoudule improvement? |
| Bill Lear | Git rescue mission |
| Sam Song | Fwd: [OT] Re: Git via a proxy server? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Edwin Eyan Moragas | poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance |
| Alexey Suslikov | OT: OpenBSD on Asus eeePC |
| Juan Miscaro | Not updating .libs-XXXXX, remember to clean it (huh?) |
| Bob Copeland | [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 |
| Miklos Szeredi | [RFC] fuse writable mmap design |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [6/18] BKL-removal: Convert ext4 to use unlocked_ioctl |
| Peter Zijlstra | Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB |
