On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:53:12 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:Will this patch be applied to 2.6.24 stable? I think I have been hit by the same problem recently: WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2054 tcp_mark_head_lost() Pid: 16959, comm: X Tainted: P 2.6.24.3-desktop-3mnb #1 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff8045550c>] tcp_ack+0x180c/0x1d60 [<ffffffff80494259>] _read_lock_bh+0x9/0x20 [<ffffffff80458075>] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x3b5/0xd00 [<ffffffff8045f818>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xc8/0x3f0 [<ffffffff885601b3>] :nf_conntrack_ipv4:ipv4_confirm+0x33/0x60 [<ffffffff8043c316>] nf_iterate+0x66/0xc0 [<ffffffff804621b8>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x898/0xaf0 [<ffffffff80442ec3>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xc3/0x250 [<ffffffff80442b64>] ip_rcv_finish+0x114/0x3b0 [<ffffffff80443365>] ip_rcv+0x205/0x2f0 [<ffffffff8041c45c>] netif_receive_skb+0x3ac/0x490 [<ffffffff88184509>] :forcedeth:nv_napi_poll+0xf9/0x850 [<ffffffff8041eaa8>] net_rx_action+0x128/0x230 [<ffffffff802412a5>] __do_softirq+0x75/0xe0 [<ffffffff8020d4fc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff8020f6c5>] do_softirq+0x35/0x90 [<ffffffff80241228>] irq_exit+0x88/0x90 [<ffffffff8020f910>] do_IRQ+0x80/0x100 [<ffffffff8020c881>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa <EOI> WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2413 tcp_fastretrans_alert() Pid: 4053, comm: rsyslogd Tainted: P 2.6.24.3-desktop-3mnb #1 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff80455a2d>] tcp_ack+0x1d2d/0x1d60 [<ffffffff80494259>] _read_lock_bh+0x9/0x20 [<ffffffff80458075>] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x3b5/0xd00 [<ffffffff8045f818>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xc8/0x3f0 [<ffffffff885601b3>] :nf_conntrack_ipv4:ipv4_confirm+0x33/0x60 [<ffffffff8043c316>] nf_iterate+0x66/0xc0 [<ffffffff804621b8>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x898/0xaf0 [<ffffffff80442ec3>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0xc3/0x250 [<ffffffff80442b64>] ip_rcv_finish+0x114/0x3b0 [<ffffffff80443365>] ip_rcv+0x205/0x2f0 [<ffffffff8041c45c>] netif_receive_skb+0x3ac/0x490 [<ffffffff88184509>] :forcedeth:nv_napi_poll+0xf9/0x850 [<ffffffff8041eaa8>] net_rx_action+0x128/0x230 [<ffffffff802412a5>] __do_softirq+0x75/0xe0 [<ffffffff8020d4fc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 [<ffffffff8020f6c5>] do_softirq+0x35/0x90 [<ffffffff80241228>] irq_exit+0x88/0x90 [<ffffffff8020f910>] do_IRQ+0x80/0x100 [<ffffffff8020c881>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa <EOI> -- Frederik Himpe --
| Artem Bityutskiy | [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation |
| Jeremy Fitzhardinge | [PATCH 03 of 36] x86: add memory barriers to wrmsr |
| Zachary Amsden | Re: [patch 13/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Consistently wrap paravirt ops callsites to ma... |
| Justin Mattock | macbook pro dvd playback after suspend Buffer I/O error |
git: | |
| David Kastrup | Empty directories... |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: [PATCH 1/4] Move redo merge code in a function |
| Jeff King | Re: detecting rename->commit->modify->commit |
| Pierre Habouzit | Re: [RFC] git integrated bugtracking |
| David Higgs | Re: Using the C programming language |
| Chris Bullock | OpenBSD isakmpd and pf vs Cisco PIX or ASA |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Chris S | Re: No text cursor on OpenBSD/i386 4.1 |
| Jojie R. T. | Re: SLS |
| Peter MacDonald | demand paging: proposal |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Battery Maximizer Software | 8 hours ago | Linux kernel |
| windows folder creation surprise | 10 hours ago | Windows |
| Problem in scim in Fedora 9 | 11 hours ago | Linux general |
| Firewall | 1 day ago | OpenBSD |
| IP layer send packet | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
| dtrace for linux available | 2 days ago | Linux kernel |
| Unable to mount ramdisk image using UBoot while upgrading to 2.6.15 kernel for a MPC8540 based target | 2 days ago | Linux kernel |
| RealTek RTL8169 - can't connect | 2 days ago | NetBSD |
| vsftpd Upload Problems | 2 days ago | Linux general |
| creating con folder in desktop | 3 days ago | Windows |
