login
Header Space

 
 

Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...>, Thomas Meyer <thomas@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>
Date: Sunday, March 23, 2008 - 2:35 am

* Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:


64-bit ioremap on x86 never worked AFAIK, the whole API is using 32-bit 
physical addresses which is limited to 4GB. But ... this bug does have 
the feeling of the wrong IO side physical memory being mapped. (0xff 
data means there's no device there - typical of non-existent RAM/IO)

could you please pull the x86/latest tree to do a kernel pagetable dump 
for us? You can pull it via the instructions here:

   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README

then enable CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y and CONFIG_X86_PTDUMP=y boot the 
kernel so that ohci1394 doesnt work. Then dump the pagetables and other 
hw info via:

   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh

send us the cfs-debug-info file that gets generated. We'll be able to 
tell from that whether your ioremap's are OK. (x86/latest will also 
printk all ioremap()s and results that are done)

thanks,

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Mar 21, 9:59 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Mar 31, 2:21 pm)
2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Thu Apr 3, 3:06 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Fri Apr 4, 10:27 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 6:51 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Mon Apr 7, 11:51 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 7, 1:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc7/8: Another resume regression, Mark Lord, (Tue Apr 8, 11:35 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Tino Keitel, (Mon Mar 31, 5:04 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Tino Keitel, (Mon Mar 31, 5:26 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert "PCI: remove transparent bridge sizi..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 7:45 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert "PCI: remove transparent bridge sizi..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 5:57 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert "PCI: remove transparent bridge sizi..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 7:17 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert "PCI: remove transparent bridge sizi..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 6:29 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert "PCI: remove transparent bridge sizi..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 6:54 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert "PCI: remove transparent bridge sizi..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 7:18 pm)
Re: [patch] pci: revert "PCI: remove transparent bridge sizi..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 6:27 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Rep..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 8:17 am)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Rep..., Ingo Molnar, (Sun Mar 23, 2:35 am)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Rep..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Mar 25, 11:39 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Rep..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Wed Mar 26, 7:25 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Rep..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Mar 25, 7:33 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Rep..., Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Tue Mar 25, 8:12 pm)
Re: ohci1394 problem (MMIO broken) (was 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Rep..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 22, 1:58 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Mar 21, 10:52 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 22, 7:11 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Romano Giannetti, (Thu Mar 27, 6:18 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Mar 26, 6:11 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Mar 26, 1:02 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Heiko Carstens, (Sat Mar 22, 12:32 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 22, 1:56 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Andrew Morton, (Sat Mar 22, 1:33 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Mar 22, 7:15 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 22, 1:53 pm)
speck-geostationary