Re: [00/14] Virtual Compound Page Support V3

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>
Cc: <linux-mm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, March 22, 2008 - 2:40 pm

On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:17:03 -0700
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:



can you document the drawback of large, frequent vmalloc() allocations at least?
On 32 bit x86, the effective vmalloc space is 64Mb or so (after various PCI bars are ioremaped),
so if this type of allocation is used for a "scales with nr of ABC" where "ABC" is workload dependent,
there's a rather abrupt upper limit to this.
Not saying that that is a flaw of your patch, just pointing out that we should discourage usage of 
the "scales with nr of ABC" (for example "one for each thread") kind of things.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[00/14] Virtual Compound Page Support V3, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Mar 21, 2:17 am)
Re: [00/14] Virtual Compound Page Support V3, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Mar 22, 2:40 pm)
Re: [00/14] Virtual Compound Page Support V3, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Mar 24, 2:31 pm)
Re: [00/14] Virtual Compound Page Support V3, Christoph Lameter, (Mon Mar 24, 3:29 pm)