On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 19:32 +0100, Jörn Engel wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, 22 March 2008 18:03:55 +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> > 

quoted text
> Without a doubt, buffering is useful.  However I question how useful it
> is to implement this in individual device drivers instead of once in
> mtd_core.c.


Well, it's obviously useful to this device. Are you making best the
enemy of better?


quoted text
> 
> Given that you have ignored most of my previous comments, NAK. 


Not good enough, frankly. What comments have I ignored? I didn't
implement your suggestion that a void* memory type become be32* because
it was totally inappropriate for a type that is passed in both be32 and
le32 and as u8.


quoted text
>  I don't
> mind merging code that isn't up to our standards yet.  But I have a bad
> feeling about a maintainer that does not understand review comments.
> Since you had similar problems understanding Andrew, part of the blame
> may sit on your side.
> 

I'm sorry that you feel that way, but as you took the hump when I said
that this:

"Possibly the big-endian annotations need to trickly though the layers
here as well."

Isn't good english (and it's not) and asked you - twice - to explain
what you meant. I cannot accept your summary.


Adrian

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/