login
Header Space

 
 

Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Cc: Gabriel C <crazy@...>, Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...>, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>, <andi-bz@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Date: Saturday, March 22, 2008 - 10:25 am

> CPU0 runs the watchdog timer and schedules it on CPU1.

In my old original own noidletick code I simply limited all sleeps 
to below the wrap around of the primary timer.  Wouldn't something 
like that work?

In the case of the watchdog i guess it would need to be limited
to the wrap around of multiple timers, at least all that 
are used by the watchdog.

I'm not sure just doing this for add_timer_on() only is correct.
After all it could affect any other code not run by add_timer_on()
couldn't it?

-Andi

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 16, 7:18 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Christian Kujau, (Sun Mar 23, 5:17 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 23, 5:29 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Christian Kujau, (Sun Mar 23, 3:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 23, 3:06 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Mar 17, 5:36 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Mar 17, 12:17 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 21, 12:26 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 21, 2:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 21, 5:15 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 21, 6:09 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 22, 7:21 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Andi Kleen, (Sat Mar 22, 10:25 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 22, 10:41 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 22, 10:30 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 22, 12:32 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Mar 22, 5:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Mon Mar 24, 6:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Mar 25, 4:06 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Gleixner, (Wed Mar 26, 10:51 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Mar 16, 7:33 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 16, 7:38 pm)
speck-geostationary