On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:I already spelled it out. Add a new program header entry, point it to a bit array large enough to cover all loadable segments. It is not worth creating problems with this invalid extension just for old binaries. Just let those go. New binaries can automatically get the array and then there are no extra seeks, the format is well defined, etc. --
| Ryan Hope | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 |
| Tim Tassonis | reiser4 for 2.6.27-rc1 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [patch] MTD: fix DOC2000/2001/2001PLUS build error |
git: | |
| Petko Manolov | git and binary files |
| Wink Saville | Resolving conflicts |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Junio C Hamano | What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2008, #07; Sat, 23) |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Julien TOUCHE | setting up ssh tunnel/vpn |
| Jeffrey 'jf' Lim | Re: SSHJail patch for OpenBSD |
| Daniel Ouellet | identifying sparse files and get ride of them trick available? |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Peter MacDonald | demand paging: proposal |
| Stephen Pierce | SLS |
| Drew Eckhardt | Re: 20MB drive & wdxt-gen2 controller on 386? |
