On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:55:59 -0600 dougthompson@xmission.com wrote:Is that the best way of working out whether the CPU supports system bus parity? We do have cpu capability infrastructure in x86 core and I'd have though it would be better for x86 core to work this out, set the suitable flag and have clients (ie: EDAC) test that flag? --
| Jeremy Fitzhardinge | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| jmerkey | [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger 2.6.27-rc4 released |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 021/196] ISDN: Convert from class_device to device for ISDN capi |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Peter Stahlir | Git as a filesystem |
| Johannes Schindelin | Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names |
| Bill Lear | Meaning of "fatal: protocol error: bad line length character"? |
| Mayuresh Kathe | Re: What is our ultimate goal?? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| bofh | Re: web development on OpenBSD |
| Kevin | uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries on 4.3 i386 |
| Mark Lord | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro. |
