> On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 19:52 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
quoted text
> > Traditionally we have syscalls, and nfsd.  Both of them want the
> > security checks, and I think nfsd wants the read-only mount checking
> > as well, but I'm not entirely sure.  Maybe we can handle that by just
> > making nfsd acquire a write-ref on the mount and keep it while it's
> > exported.
> 
> The only question for me would be where the current r/o checks are
> happening (IS_RDONLY()).  I generally based my patches on replacing
> those calls.  

In may_create()/may_delete() on parent directory.  So that one needs
audit of all callers, unless Al can be convinced that moving those
checks into the VFS makes sense.

Miklos
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/