* Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:your patch indeed does not introduce it here, but KERNEL_STACK_SIZE_ORDER shows up in the x86 portion of your patch and you refer to multi-order stack allocations in your 0/14 mail :-) Ingo --
| Adrian Bunk | If you want me to quit I will quit |
| Oliver Neukum | Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Artem Bityutskiy | [RFC PATCH 25/26] UBIFS: add debugging stuff |
| David Miller | Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Jakub Narebski | Re: VCS comparison table |
| Sam Song | Fwd: [OT] Re: Git via a proxy server? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [QUESTION] about .git/info/grafts file |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Edwin Eyan Moragas | poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance |
| Alexey Suslikov | OT: OpenBSD on Asus eeePC |
| Juan Miscaro | Not updating .libs-XXXXX, remember to clean it (huh?) |
| Paul Monday - CS | Re: Things to write (was Re: How can I get a piece of the action?!) |
| Al Clark | Patching boot image (was Re: Making the file system) |
| Dimitrov T Mitev | Where to find sources for compressing programs? |
| Lars Wirzenius | Re: Parse Error |
