On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:46:56PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted text > Never mind I retract the clean up patch. While doing the actual
> reordering is not that difficult I would need to retest and I don't
> have time for that now. And since reordering tends to requiring
> typing in everything again and I make occasional typos (and I added
> bugs in the past during such reordering exercises) the retesting
> would be needed. But for that clean up it is probably not worth it.
> After all it just makes the code a little nicer, but doesn't fix
> or improve anything.
>
> Please still consider the other patches in the serioes.
Oops that ended up in the wrong thread sorry. The comment
was regarding the early exception recursion -> iteration change,
not for rdmsrl_safe (which is not a clean up)
-Andi
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] [5/7] Readd rdmsrl_safe II , Andi Kleen , (Fri Mar 21, 2:48 pm)