On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:inlines are generally preferred and the existing macro pile is no excuse to add more. Yeah, I signed up for maintaining. And review is one of the tasks of a maintainer. So when I do a review and ask for a macro -> inline change I don't see that this means that I have to do the change myself. Thanks, tglx --
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Fred . | Please add ZFS support (from GPL sources) |
| Pavel Roskin | [PATCH 2.6.25] module: allow ndiswrapper to use GPL-only symbols |
| David Howells | [PATCH 02/52] CRED: Give in_group_p() a cred pointer |
git: | |
| Dmitry Torokhov | Garbage in .git directories??? |
| Dan Farina | backup or mirror a repository |
| Sergei Organov | Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase. |
| Richard Quirk | git-cherry-pick no longer detecting moved files in 1.5.3.4 |
| Kevin | uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries on 4.3 i386 |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Douglas A. Tutty | how get colour mutt when ssh from OBSD? |
| Brandon Lee | DELL PERC 5iR slow performance |
| Hubert Feyrer | Compressed vnd handling tested successfully |
| Jaromir Dolecek | Arch-specific maxproc limit? |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | scheduler_wait_hook |
| David Laight | Re: Integrating securelevel and kauth(9) |
