* Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:

quoted text
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:26:49PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Allow the maximum number of nodes in an x86_64 system to be 
> > > configurable. This patch does NOT change the default value but allows 
> > > the value to be a config option.
> > 
> > i've applied your patch - but i'm wondering, shouldnt we auto-scale the 
> > default according to max number of CPUs? (with some sensible scaling 
> > that happens to meet your expected large-system needs as well ;-) All 
> > the current manual configuration of nodes shift is ugly.
> 
> I would prefer to auto-scale, too, but our hardware platform allows 
> too many options to make it easy. The current system configs will 
> support from 0 to 32 cpus per node (some nodes have memory only).
> 
> However, I'm open to suggestions if you have any ideas....

how about scaling for the worst case, and allowing distros to tune down 
if they really want? What's the cost of a too large NODE_SHIFT?

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/