[MMC Stack] Partition limitation question

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH 00/12] mm/x86: bootmem by Ingo Molnar on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 3:54 am. (1 message)

Next thread: Why is the rewritten ramdisk driver called brd instad of rd by Christoph Hellwig on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 6:05 am. (5 messages)
From: Rogier Stam
Date: Friday, March 21, 2008 - 4:38 am

Hi,

I had a short question about the limitation of max. 8
partitions in the MMC stack. Before the kernel was
limited to 256 minor numbers, but I believe this is no
longer the case (65536 if I recall correctly). Is
there a way around this 8 partition limitation?

I understand that simply renumbering all minor numbers
is not really a preferred situation as it would
require everyone to recreate their device nodes.

Regards,

Rogier


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--

From: Pierre Ossman
Date: Saturday, April 5, 2008 - 4:01 am

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:38:04 -0700 (PDT)


Indeed. And some embedded systems might not be able to use 32-bit
device nodes. Russell, do you have any insight to share?

Rgds

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  PulseAudio, core developer          http://pulseaudio.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
--

Previous thread: Re: [PATCH 00/12] mm/x86: bootmem by Ingo Molnar on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 3:54 am. (1 message)

Next thread: Why is the rewritten ramdisk driver called brd instad of rd by Christoph Hellwig on Friday, March 21, 2008 - 6:05 am. (5 messages)