* Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org> wrote:

quoted text
> >>  -       if (!is_vsmp_box() && (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD))
> >>  +       if ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) && !is_vsmp_box())
> >>                 return 0;

quoted text
> Yes.  The first call is to state that TSC's are synced if it is an AMD 
> box and if it is _not_ a vSMPowered box (for the apic id lifting case 
> on Sun boxes), the second call is for _any_ vSMPowered system with 
> more than one board -- TSC's are not guaranteed to be synched in that 
> case.  Both these calls are needed.

i suspect there are two questions here: firstly, your change only flips 
the condition around which should not have any effect _normally_. But 
the thing is that is_vsmp_box() has side-effects: it reads the PCI 
config space and sets a flag. It would be cleaner if there was a 
separate, explicit detect_vsmp_box() call early during bootup which did 
the PCI config space access, and is_vsmp_box() would only return the 
current state of the vsmp flag. Then your above change would be 
unnecessary.

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/