Re: [PATCH 1/2] kthread: add a missing memory barrier to kthread_stop()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Sunday, March 2, 2008 - 2:50 pm

On Thursday 21 February 2008 08:36:30 Dmitry Adamushko wrote:

I always believed that wake_up_process() implies a write barrier.  It's pretty 
common to set something up then wake the intended recipient.

So I think this patch is overkill, but I'm happy to be corrected.

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] kthread: add a missing memory barrier to k ..., Rusty Russell, (Sun Mar 2, 2:50 pm)