Re: [PATCH 1/2] kthread: add a missing memory barrier to kthread_stop()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...>
Date: Sunday, March 2, 2008 - 5:50 pm

On Thursday 21 February 2008 08:36:30 Dmitry Adamushko wrote:

I always believed that wake_up_process() implies a write barrier.  It's pretty 
common to set something up then wake the intended recipient.

So I think this patch is overkill, but I'm happy to be corrected.

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/2] kthread: add a missing memory barrier to kth..., Rusty Russell, (Sun Mar 2, 5:50 pm)