On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Jiri Kosina wrote:

quoted text
> Could you please try what is the output with the attached patch below, so 
> that we know which spinlock buggers?

Uhm, and hereby I attach the patch.

diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index c47e872..2abfb70 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -615,6 +615,7 @@ static void shm_get_stat(struct ipc_namespace *ns, unsigned long *rss,
 			*rss += (HPAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE)*mapping->nrpages;
 		} else {
 			struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
+			printk(KERN_DEBUG "info: %p\n", info);
 			spin_lock(&info->lock);
 			*rss += inode->i_mapping->nrpages;
 			*swp += info->swapped;
diff --git a/ipc/util.c b/ipc/util.c
index fd1b50d..5a0d4d2 100644
--- a/ipc/util.c
+++ b/ipc/util.c
@@ -662,6 +662,7 @@ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipc_lock(struct ipc_ids *ids, int id)
 
 	up_read(&ids->rw_mutex);
 
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "out: %p\n", out);
 	spin_lock(&out->lock);
 	
 	/* ipc_rmid() may have already freed the ID while ipc_lock
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/