Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 - 12:12 am

On Tuesday 18 March 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:

You could have an #else path in linux/irq.h to just define these
functions as s390, maybe like

static inline int irq_set_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t cpumask)
{
	BUG();
	return 0;
}
static inline int irq_can_set_affinity(unsigned int irq)
{
	return 0;
}

	Arnd <><
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Heiko Carstens, (Tue Mar 18, 5:31 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Arnd Bergmann, (Wed Mar 19, 12:12 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Mar 19, 1:45 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 21, 6:15 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Heiko Carstens, (Fri Mar 21, 9:25 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri Mar 21, 10:45 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Heiko Carstens, (Sat Mar 22, 4:32 pm)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Russell King, (Sun Mar 23, 6:34 pm)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Mar 25, 3:09 pm)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Heiko Carstens, (Tue Apr 1, 7:02 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Apr 1, 7:24 am)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Russell King, (Tue Mar 25, 3:30 pm)
Re: tick-common.c hack for s390 needed, Heiko Carstens, (Mon Mar 24, 6:14 am)