Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too high values

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Jan Engelhardt

Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too high values

Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 9:40 am

On Mar 17 2008 14:11, Jan Kara wrote:
quoted text>>
>> For 2.6.26, I assume?  I am not able to determine the seriousness of this
>> problem from the changelog nor from the patch itself.
>
>  Not really serious. Nobody complained so far (i.e., for the time quota
> exists) and the limits will just wrap when you try to set them over 4TB
> now. So the patch can wait...

So does quota_v2.c even handle quotas > 4 TB?
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too high v ..., Jan Kara, (Wed Mar 12, 10:22 am)

Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too hi ..., Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 13, 1:03 pm)

Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too hi ..., Jan Kara, (Mon Mar 17, 6:11 am)

Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too hi ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Mar 18, 9:40 am)

Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too hi ..., Jan Kara, (Tue Mar 18, 9:44 am)

Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too hi ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue Mar 18, 2:48 pm)

Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too hi ..., Jan Kara, (Wed Mar 19, 2:54 am)

Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too hi ..., Jan Engelhardt, (Wed Mar 19, 4:43 am)


linux-kernel:
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]	2.6.21.5 june 30th to july 1st date hang?
Jeff Dike	[ PATCH 2/6 ] UML - Formatting fixes around os_{read_write}_file callers
Liam Girdwood	[PATCH 07/13] regulator: regulator test harness
Oleg Nesterov	Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Stefan Seyfried	Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18
linux-netdev:
Arnaud Ebalard	Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] MIPv6 support broken by f4f914b58019f0
Jan Engelhardt	Re: [PATCH iptables] extension: add xt_cpu match
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior	[PATCH 8/8] net/emergency: remove locking from reycling pool if emergncy pools are...
David Miller	Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: dont assume NET_IP_ALIGN is 2
git:
Jakub Narebski	Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Brandon Casey	Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the def...
Christian Couder	[PATCH 1/3] rev-parse: add test script for "--verify"
Ramkumar Ramachandra	Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: The final one
Junio C Hamano	Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
openbsd-misc:
Joachim Schipper	Re: UVC Webcams
Florin Andrei	SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong]
Todd Alan Smith	Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
Neal Hogan	Re: Need Advice: Thinkpad T60 or T61?
Sam Fourman Jr.	Re: Real men don't attack straw men
git-commits-head:
Linux Kernel Mailing List	ACPI: Disable ARB_DISABLE on platforms where it is not needed
Linux Kernel Mailing List	m68knommu: add read_barrier_depends() and irqs_disabled_flags()
Linux Kernel Mailing List	[MTD] Add mtd panic_write function pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List	[ARM] pxa: remove duplicate select statements from Kconfig
Linux Kernel Mailing List	mlx4_core: Don't read reserved fields in mlx4_QUERY_ADAPTER()