Re: [Build Failure] linux-next: Tree for March 18

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...>
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...>, <linux-next@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <stern@...>, <lenb@...>, <greg@...>, <akpm@...>, <rjw@...>
Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 - 9:31 am

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 04:46:45PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:

This breakage is shown up when compiled with a config which doesn't have
CONFIG_PM set.  It is a common error to only test with that turned on
and I am sure that this is just one of a number of bugs that have been
picked up by real machine configs.

Perhaps it would be worth having one of your integration test runs be
with a configuration with CONFIG_PM disabled so that they get detected
earlier in the process.

-apw
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for March 18, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue Mar 18, 5:52 am)
[Build Failure] linux-next: Tree for March 18 , Kamalesh Babulal, (Tue Mar 18, 7:16 am)
Re: [Build Failure] linux-next: Tree for March 18, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Mar 19, 7:13 pm)
Re: [Build Failure] linux-next: Tree for March 18, Andy Whitcroft, (Tue Mar 18, 9:31 am)
Re: [Build Failure] linux-next: Tree for March 18, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Mar 19, 7:20 pm)