Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Monday, March 17, 2008 - 8:23 am

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:59:02PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:

VESA Local Bus.  It was (in some sense) the predecessor of AGP.  We
treat it like ISA inside the kernel.  On x86, EISA depends on ISA, so
the dependency, while wrong, does not affect any x86 users who have an
EISA card.


I believe this will work for VESA and EISA cards, though not, indeed for
ISA cards.


That doesn't mean it doesn't have users ...

On the other hand, the u14-34f driver is supposed to be preferred to
the ultrastor drivers.  Only problem: it doesn't support the 24F card.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, Boaz Harrosh, (Mon Mar 17, 7:59 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, James Bottomley, (Mon Mar 17, 8:23 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, Matthew Wilcox, (Mon Mar 17, 8:23 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, Boaz Harrosh, (Mon Mar 17, 9:00 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, James Bottomley, (Mon Mar 17, 9:03 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, Alan Cox, (Mon Mar 17, 9:07 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, Boaz Harrosh, (Mon Mar 17, 10:01 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, James Bottomley, (Mon Mar 17, 10:25 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri Mar 21, 1:41 pm)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, Boaz Harrosh, (Sun Mar 23, 2:54 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Mar 23, 9:24 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, Al Viro, (Sun Mar 23, 10:16 am)
Re: ultrastor.c is a bit-rot, H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Mar 23, 10:18 am)