Re: [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...>
Cc: <linux-mm@...>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...>, Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...>, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...>, <lizf@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <taka@...>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...>, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...>
Date: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 7:26 pm

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

What's the performance hit of doing these accounting checks on every
mmap/munmap? If it's not totally lost in the noise, couldn't it be
made a separate control group, so that it could be just enabled (and
the performance hit taken) for users that actually want it?

Paul
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups, Balbir Singh, (Sun Mar 16, 1:29 pm)
Re: [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups, Paul Menage, (Sun Mar 16, 7:26 pm)
Re: [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups, Balbir Singh, (Sun Mar 16, 11:12 pm)
Re: [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups, Balbir Singh, (Mon Mar 17, 11:15 am)