Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86-64: introduce fast variant of smp_call_function_single()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <npiggin@...>, <dgc@...>
Date: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 6:58 pm

Jens Axboe wrote:

Hm, yes.  Would it be possible to implement smp_call_function_mask in a 
generic way to avoid that?  Turn the static structure into a per-cpu 
request list?

    J
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Wed Mar 12, 7:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Alan D. Brunelle, (Thu Mar 13, 10:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 13, 11:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Wed Mar 12, 4:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 13, 8:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Alan D. Brunelle, (Wed Mar 12, 12:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Wed Mar 12, 1:54 pm)
[PATCH 3/7] x86: add fast smp_call_function_single(), Jens Axboe, (Wed Mar 12, 7:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86-64: introduce fast variant of smp_call_f..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Mar 14, 2:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86-64: introduce fast variant of smp_call_f..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Mar 16, 6:58 pm)