login
Login / Register
Header Space

 
 

Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » March » 16

use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...>
To: David Brownell <dbrownell@...>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, David Brownell <david-b@...>
Subject: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c
Date: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 2:43 pm

David, Richard,

Is the use of "if (preempt_count())" to know when to defer led gpio work to
a workqueue needed?  Shouldn't "if (in_atomic())" be enough?

I have found no other such uses of preempt_count() anywhere in kernel code,
while in_atomic() is used for that sort of heuristic in various places.

Relevant git commit id is: 00852279af5ad26956bc7f4d0e86fdb40192e542
"leds: Teach leds-gpio to handle timer-unsafe GPIOs".   It made mainline in
2.6.23-rc1.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Sun Mar 16, 2:43 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, David Brownell, (Sun Mar 16, 3:46 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Tue Mar 18, 3:14 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Thu Mar 20, 6:56 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 20, 7:47 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Richard Purdie, (Thu Mar 20, 8:56 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Thu Mar 20, 10:10 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Thu Mar 20, 8:36 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 20, 9:08 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, David Brownell, (Fri Mar 21, 1:04 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 5:21 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Fri Mar 21, 8:37 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 9:16 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Sat Mar 22, 7:29 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 5:27 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Alan Stern, (Thu Mar 20, 9:31 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Michael Buesch, (Thu Mar 20, 9:36 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 20, 10:27 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Heiko Carstens, (Fri Mar 21, 9:47 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Greg KH, (Fri Mar 21, 12:54 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 21, 3:59 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Michael Buesch, (Fri Mar 21, 4:16 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Michael Buesch, (Fri Mar 21, 4:20 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Alan Stern, (Thu Mar 20, 11:07 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 20, 11:17 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Tetsuo Handa, (Fri Mar 21, 11:11 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 12:54 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 1:02 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Tetsuo Handa, (Sun Mar 23, 1:53 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Jean Delvare, (Fri Mar 21, 5:53 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 21, 1:37 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Alan Stern, (Fri Mar 21, 2:05 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio..., Jonathan Corbet, (Mon Mar 24, 3:34 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 24, 3:42 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio..., Jonathan Corbet, (Mon Mar 24, 3:53 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Junio C Hamano, (Tue Mar 25, 4:52 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio..., Jonathan Corbet, (Tue Mar 25, 9:44 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, David Brownell, (Tue Mar 25, 7:20 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Alan Stern, (Wed Mar 26, 10:28 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Wed Mar 26, 12:17 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, David Brownell, (Thu Mar 27, 2:51 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Richard Purdie, (Wed Mar 26, 12:46 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Jean Delvare, (Tue Mar 25, 6:39 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, David Brownell, (Tue Mar 18, 3:06 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Tue Mar 18, 4:07 pm)

Mail archive search
Enter your search terms.
Optionally limit your search to a specific mailing list.
advanced
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently 6 users and 1423 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate
Syndicate content
© 2007 KernelTrap.  |  Powered by Drupal.  |  Legal statement.
speck-geostationary