On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, Richard Purdie wrote:Richard, any ideas for that? It *is* still time to change this for 2.6.25, if required. If you changed it once already, changing it again won't cause further damage. I need to know if the current naming scheme will hold or not, I do NOT want an ABI issue on thinkpad-acpi, and I know for a fact at least Debian will want to use the thinkpad-acpi LED interface as soon as I deploy it. I want to send the thinkpad-acpi LED interface patches to the users as soon as possible. Sincerely? I think you should make it <function>:[color][.instance] and drop device name compleley, ASAP. I will write the patches for mainline and your for-mm branch, if that would speed up things. But I need to know what you have decided, first. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh --
| monstr | [PATCH 26/60] microblaze_v4: time support |
| Jon Smirl | Re: 463 kernel developers missing! |
| Andrew Morton | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jiri Olsa | [PATCHv5 0/2] net: fix race in the receive/select |
