Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-arch@...>
Date: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 10:33 am

Andi Kleen wrote:

kvm is also a heavy user of smp_call_function_mask(); if you run 
multiple smp guests you'll see plenty of disjoint smp_call_function_mask()s.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 8:42 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Feb 27, 9:27 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 9:50 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Feb 27, 11:02 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 6:14 pm)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Feb 28, 4:45 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Andi Kleen, (Thu Feb 28, 8:55 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Andi Kleen, (Wed Feb 27, 9:04 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Nick Piggin, (Wed Feb 27, 9:07 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Andi Kleen, (Wed Feb 27, 9:33 am)
Re: [rfc][patch] x86-64 new smp_call_function design, Avi Kivity, (Sun Mar 16, 10:33 am)