Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Sunday, March 16, 2008 - 7:04 am

On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 02:10:46PM +0100, Chr wrote:

How do you know for sure it's the same problem?

An example from doing regression tracking for an earlier kernel:
There were four similar sounding regression reports.
Three for one regression.
And the fourth turned out to be a completely different regression.

Most likely it will turn out these two reports are for the same 
regression, but until that's verified it mustn't be assumed that
they are for sure for the same regression.


cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sat Mar 15, 5:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Stephen Gran, (Sat Mar 15, 6:15 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Mar 16, 5:33 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Mar 16, 7:04 am)