Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C
implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and
extensibility.  Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep
warning.  Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the
unlikely() was unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile               |    2 +-
 arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c          |    9 -
 arch/alpha/kernel/semaphore.c            |  224 --------------------------
 arch/arm/kernel/Makefile                 |    2 +-
 arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c              |  221 --------------------------
 arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile               |    2 +-
 arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c            |  148 -----------------
 arch/blackfin/Kconfig                    |    4 -
 arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_ksyms.c        |    5 -
 arch/cris/kernel/Makefile                |    3 +-
 arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c             |    7 -
 arch/cris/kernel/semaphore.c             |  129 ---------------
 arch/frv/kernel/Makefile                 |    2 +-
 arch/frv/kernel/frv_ksyms.c              |    1 -
 arch/frv/kernel/semaphore.c              |  155 ------------------
 arch/h8300/kernel/Makefile               |    2 +-
 arch/h8300/kernel/h8300_ksyms.c          |    1 -
 arch/h8300/kernel/semaphore.c            |  132 ----------------
 arch/ia64/kernel/Makefile                |    2 +-
 arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c            |    6 -
 arch/ia64/kernel/semaphore.c             |  165 -------------------
 arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile                |    2 +-
 arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c            |    5 -
 arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c             |  185 ----------------------
 arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile                |    2 +-
 arch/m68k/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c            |    6 -
 arch/m68k/kernel/semaphore.c             |  132 ----------------
 arch/m68k/lib/Makefile                   |    2 +-
 arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S                |   53 ------
 arch/m68knommu/kernel/Makefile           |    2 +-
 arch/m68knommu/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c       |    6 -
 arch/m68knommu/kernel/semaphore.c        |  133 ----------------
 arch/m68knommu/lib/Makefile              |    2 +-
 arch/m68knommu/lib/semaphore.S           |   66 --------
 arch/mips/kernel/Makefile                |    2 +-
 arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c             |  168 --------------------
 arch/mn10300/kernel/Makefile             |    2 +-
 arch/mn10300/kernel/semaphore.c          |  149 -----------------
 arch/parisc/kernel/Makefile              |    2 +-
 arch/parisc/kernel/parisc_ksyms.c        |    5 -
 arch/parisc/kernel/semaphore.c           |  102 ------------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile             |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c          |    1 -
 arch/powerpc/kernel/semaphore.c          |  135 ----------------
 arch/ppc/kernel/semaphore.c              |  131 ---------------
 arch/s390/kernel/Makefile                |    2 +-
 arch/s390/kernel/s390_ksyms.c            |    7 -
 arch/s390/kernel/semaphore.c             |  108 -------------
 arch/sh/kernel/Makefile_32               |    2 +-
 arch/sh/kernel/Makefile_64               |    2 +-
 arch/sh/kernel/semaphore.c               |  139 ----------------
 arch/sh/kernel/sh_ksyms_32.c             |    7 -
 arch/sh/kernel/sh_ksyms_64.c             |    4 -
 arch/sparc/kernel/Makefile               |    2 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/semaphore.c            |  155 ------------------
 arch/sparc/kernel/sparc_ksyms.c          |    5 -
 arch/sparc64/kernel/Makefile             |    2 +-
 arch/sparc64/kernel/semaphore.c          |  254 ------------------------------
 arch/sparc64/kernel/sparc64_ksyms.c      |    6 -
 arch/um/Kconfig.i386                     |    4 -
 arch/um/Kconfig.x86_64                   |    4 -
 arch/um/sys-i386/ksyms.c                 |   12 --
 arch/um/sys-ppc/Makefile                 |    8 +-
 arch/um/sys-x86_64/ksyms.c               |   13 +--
 arch/v850/kernel/Makefile                |    2 +-
 arch/v850/kernel/semaphore.c             |  166 -------------------
 arch/v850/kernel/v850_ksyms.c            |    7 -
 arch/x86/Kconfig                         |    3 -
 arch/x86/kernel/i386_ksyms_32.c          |    5 -
 arch/x86/kernel/x8664_ksyms_64.c         |    6 -
 arch/x86/lib/semaphore_32.S              |   83 ----------
 arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.S                  |    5 -
 arch/xtensa/kernel/Makefile              |    2 +-
 arch/xtensa/kernel/semaphore.c           |  226 --------------------------
 arch/xtensa/kernel/xtensa_ksyms.c        |    9 -
 include/asm-alpha/semaphore.h            |  150 +-----------------
 include/asm-arm/semaphore-helper.h       |   84 ----------
 include/asm-arm/semaphore.h              |   99 +------------
 include/asm-avr32/semaphore.h            |  109 +-------------
 include/asm-blackfin/semaphore-helper.h  |   82 ----------
 include/asm-blackfin/semaphore.h         |  106 +------------
 include/asm-cris/semaphore-helper.h      |   78 ---------
 include/asm-cris/semaphore.h             |  134 +----------------
 include/asm-frv/semaphore.h              |  156 +------------------
 include/asm-h8300/semaphore-helper.h     |   85 ----------
 include/asm-h8300/semaphore.h            |  191 +----------------------
 include/asm-ia64/semaphore.h             |  100 +------------
 include/asm-m32r/semaphore.h             |  145 +-----------------
 include/asm-m68k/semaphore-helper.h      |  142 -----------------
 include/asm-m68k/semaphore.h             |  164 +-------------------
 include/asm-m68knommu/semaphore-helper.h |   82 ----------
 include/asm-m68knommu/semaphore.h        |  154 +------------------
 include/asm-mips/semaphore.h             |  109 +-------------
 include/asm-mn10300/semaphore.h          |  170 +--------------------
 include/asm-parisc/semaphore-helper.h    |   89 -----------
 include/asm-parisc/semaphore.h           |  146 +-----------------
 include/asm-powerpc/semaphore.h          |   95 +-----------
 include/asm-s390/semaphore.h             |  108 +-------------
 include/asm-sh/semaphore-helper.h        |   89 -----------
 include/asm-sh/semaphore.h               |  116 +--------------
 include/asm-sparc/semaphore.h            |  193 +----------------------
 include/asm-sparc64/semaphore.h          |   54 +------
 include/asm-um/semaphore.h               |    7 +-
 include/asm-v850/semaphore.h             |   85 +----------
 include/asm-x86/semaphore.h              |    6 +-
 include/asm-x86/semaphore_32.h           |  175 --------------------
 include/asm-x86/semaphore_64.h           |  180 ---------------------
 include/asm-xtensa/semaphore.h           |  100 +------------
 include/linux/semaphore.h                |   77 +++++++++
 kernel/Makefile                          |    2 +-
 kernel/semaphore.c                       |  187 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/Makefile                             |    1 -
 lib/semaphore-sleepers.c                 |  176 ---------------------
 113 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 7679 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/alpha/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/cris/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/frv/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/h8300/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/ia64/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/m68k/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
 delete mode 100644 arch/m68knommu/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/m68knommu/lib/semaphore.S
 delete mode 100644 arch/mips/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/mn10300/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/parisc/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/ppc/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/s390/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/sh/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/sparc/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/sparc64/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/v850/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 arch/xtensa/kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-arm/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-blackfin/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-cris/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-h8300/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-m68k/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-m68knommu/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-parisc/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-sh/semaphore-helper.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-x86/semaphore_32.h
 delete mode 100644 include/asm-x86/semaphore_64.h
 create mode 100644 include/linux/semaphore.h
 create mode 100644 kernel/semaphore.c
 delete mode 100644 lib/semaphore-sleepers.c

diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile b/arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile
index dccf052..ac706c1 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/Makefile
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ EXTRA_AFLAGS	:= $(KBUILD_CFLAGS)
 EXTRA_CFLAGS	:= -Werror -Wno-sign-compare
 
 obj-y    := entry.o traps.o process.o init_task.o osf_sys.o irq.o \
-	    irq_alpha.o signal.o setup.o ptrace.o time.o semaphore.o \
+	    irq_alpha.o signal.o setup.o ptrace.o time.o \
 	    alpha_ksyms.o systbls.o err_common.o io.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_VGA_HOSE)	+= console.o
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c
index e9762a3..d96e742 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c
@@ -77,15 +77,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__do_clear_user);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__strncpy_from_user);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__strnlen_user);
 
-/* Semaphore helper functions.  */
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed_interruptible);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up_wakeup);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(down);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_interruptible);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_trylock);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(up);
-
 /* 
  * SMP-specific symbols.
  */
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 8d2982a..0000000
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,224 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Alpha semaphore implementation.
- *
- * (C) Copyright 1996 Linus Torvalds
- * (C) Copyright 1999, 2000 Richard Henderson
- */
-
-#include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-
-/*
- * This is basically the PPC semaphore scheme ported to use
- * the Alpha ll/sc sequences, so see the PPC code for
- * credits.
- */
-
-/*
- * Atomically update sem->count.
- * This does the equivalent of the following:
- *
- *	old_count = sem->count;
- *	tmp = MAX(old_count, 0) + incr;
- *	sem->count = tmp;
- *	return old_count;
- */
-static inline int __sem_update_count(struct semaphore *sem, int incr)
-{
-	long old_count, tmp = 0;
-
-	__asm__ __volatile__(
-	"1:	ldl_l	%0,%2\n"
-	"	cmovgt	%0,%0,%1\n"
-	"	addl	%1,%3,%1\n"
-	"	stl_c	%1,%2\n"
-	"	beq	%1,2f\n"
-	"	mb\n"
-	".subsection 2\n"
-	"2:	br	1b\n"
-	".previous"
-	: "=&r" (old_count), "=&r" (tmp), "=m" (sem->count)
-	: "Ir" (incr), "1" (tmp), "m" (sem->count));
-
-	return old_count;
-}
-
-/*
- * Perform the "down" function.  Return zero for semaphore acquired,
- * return negative for signalled out of the function.
- *
- * If called from down, the return is ignored and the wait loop is
- * not interruptible.  This means that a task waiting on a semaphore
- * using "down()" cannot be killed until someone does an "up()" on
- * the semaphore.
- *
- * If called from down_interruptible, the return value gets checked
- * upon return.  If the return value is negative then the task continues
- * with the negative value in the return register (it can be tested by
- * the caller).
- *
- * Either form may be used in conjunction with "up()".
- */
-
-void __sched
-__down_failed(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): down failed(%p)\n",
-	       tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), sem);
-#endif
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	wmb();
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	/*
-	 * Try to get the semaphore.  If the count is > 0, then we've
-	 * got the semaphore; we decrement count and exit the loop.
-	 * If the count is 0 or negative, we set it to -1, indicating
-	 * that we are asleep, and then sleep.
-	 */
-	while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
-		schedule();
-		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-
-	/*
-	 * If there are any more sleepers, wake one of them up so
-	 * that it can either get the semaphore, or set count to -1
-	 * indicating that there are still processes sleeping.
-	 */
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): down acquired(%p)\n",
-	       tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), sem);
-#endif
-}
-
-int __sched
-__down_failed_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-	long ret = 0;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): down failed(%p)\n",
-	       tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk), sem);
-#endif
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	wmb();
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	while (__sem_update_count(sem, -1) <= 0) {
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			/*
-			 * A signal is pending - give up trying.
-			 * Set sem->count to 0 if it is negative,
-			 * since we are no longer sleeping.
-			 */
-			__sem_update_count(sem, 0);
-			ret = -EINTR;
-			break;
-		}
-		schedule();
-		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	}
-
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): down %s(%p)\n",
-	       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
-	       (ret < 0 ? "interrupted" : "acquired"), sem);
-#endif
-	return ret;
-}
-
-void
-__up_wakeup(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Note that we incremented count in up() before we came here,
-	 * but that was ineffective since the result was <= 0, and
-	 * any negative value of count is equivalent to 0.
-	 * This ends up setting count to 1, unless count is now > 0
-	 * (i.e. because some other cpu has called up() in the meantime),
-	 * in which case we just increment count.
-	 */
-	__sem_update_count(sem, 1);
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-void __sched
-down(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-#ifdef WAITQUEUE_DEBUG
-	CHECK_MAGIC(sem->__magic);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): down(%p) <count=%d> from %p\n",
-	       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), sem,
-	       atomic_read(&sem->count), __builtin_return_address(0));
-#endif
-	__down(sem);
-}
-
-int __sched
-down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-#ifdef WAITQUEUE_DEBUG
-	CHECK_MAGIC(sem->__magic);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): down(%p) <count=%d> from %p\n",
-	       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), sem,
-	       atomic_read(&sem->count), __builtin_return_address(0));
-#endif
-	return __down_interruptible(sem);
-}
-
-int
-down_trylock(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	int ret;
-
-#ifdef WAITQUEUE_DEBUG
-	CHECK_MAGIC(sem->__magic);
-#endif
-
-	ret = __down_trylock(sem);
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): down_trylock %s from %p\n",
-	       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
-	       ret ? "failed" : "acquired",
-	       __builtin_return_address(0));
-#endif
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
-void
-up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-#ifdef WAITQUEUE_DEBUG
-	CHECK_MAGIC(sem->__magic);
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-	printk("%s(%d): up(%p) <count=%d> from %p\n",
-	       current->comm, task_pid_nr(current), sem,
-	       atomic_read(&sem->count), __builtin_return_address(0));
-#endif
-	__up(sem);
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
index 00d44c6..6235f72 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ AFLAGS_head.o := -DTEXT_OFFSET=$(TEXT_OFFSET)
 # Object file lists.
 
 obj-y		:= compat.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \
-		   process.o ptrace.o semaphore.o setup.o signal.o \
+		   process.o ptrace.o setup.o signal.o \
 		   sys_arm.o stacktrace.o time.o traps.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API)	+= dma.o
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 981fe5c..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,221 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  ARM semaphore implementation, taken from
- *
- *  i386 semaphore implementation.
- *
- *  (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds
- *
- *  Modified for ARM by Russell King
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
- * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
- * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping"
- * variable is a count of such acquires.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
- * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
- * needs to do something only if count was negative before
- * the increment operation.
- *
- * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is
- * protected by the semaphore spinlock.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is
- * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
- * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
- * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
- * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-
-/*
- * Logic:
- *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
- *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
- *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
- *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure
- *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
- *    we cannot lose wakeup events.
- */
-
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(semaphore_lock);
-
-void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-	sem->sleepers++;
-	for (;;) {
-		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-		 * playing, because we own the spinlock.
-		 */
-		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
-		spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-
-		schedule();
-		tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-		spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	int retval = 0;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-	sem->sleepers ++;
-	for (;;) {
-		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * With signals pending, this turns into
-		 * the trylock failure case - we won't be
-		 * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as
-		 * it has contention. Just correct the count
-		 * and exit.
-		 */
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			retval = -EINTR;
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-		 * playing, because we own the spinlock. The
-		 * "-1" is because we're still hoping to get
-		 * the lock.
-		 */
-		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
-		spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-
-		schedule();
-		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-		spin_lock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irq(&semaphore_lock);
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-	return retval;
-}
-
-/*
- * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for
- * having decremented the count.
- *
- * We could have done the trylock with a
- * single "cmpxchg" without failure cases,
- * but then it wouldn't work on a 386.
- */
-int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	int sleepers;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&semaphore_lock, flags);
-	sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1;
-	sem->sleepers = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't
-	 * playing, because we own the spinlock.
-	 */
-	if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count))
-		wake_up(&sem->wait);
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&semaphore_lock, flags);
-	return 1;
-}
-
-/*
- * The semaphore operations have a special calling sequence that
- * allow us to do a simpler in-line version of them. These routines
- * need to convert that sequence back into the C sequence when
- * there is contention on the semaphore.
- *
- * ip contains the semaphore pointer on entry. Save the C-clobbered
- * registers (r0 to r3 and lr), but not ip, as we use it as a return
- * value in some cases..
- * To remain AAPCS compliant (64-bit stack align) we save r4 as well.
- */
-asm("	.section .sched.text,\"ax\",%progbits	\n\
-	.align	5				\n\
-	.globl	__down_failed			\n\
-__down_failed:					\n\
-	stmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, lr}		\n\
-	mov	r0, ip				\n\
-	bl	__down				\n\
-	ldmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, pc}		\n\
-						\n\
-	.align	5				\n\
-	.globl	__down_interruptible_failed	\n\
-__down_interruptible_failed:			\n\
-	stmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, lr}		\n\
-	mov	r0, ip				\n\
-	bl	__down_interruptible		\n\
-	mov	ip, r0				\n\
-	ldmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, pc}		\n\
-						\n\
-	.align	5				\n\
-	.globl	__down_trylock_failed		\n\
-__down_trylock_failed:				\n\
-	stmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, lr}		\n\
-	mov	r0, ip				\n\
-	bl	__down_trylock			\n\
-	mov	ip, r0				\n\
-	ldmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, pc}		\n\
-						\n\
-	.align	5				\n\
-	.globl	__up_wakeup			\n\
-__up_wakeup:					\n\
-	stmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, lr}		\n\
-	mov	r0, ip				\n\
-	bl	__up				\n\
-	ldmfd	sp!, {r0 - r4, pc}		\n\
-	");
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible_failed);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_trylock_failed);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up_wakeup);
diff --git a/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile b/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile
index e4b6d12..18229d0 100644
--- a/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ extra-y				:= head.o vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SUBARCH_AVR32B)	+= entry-avr32b.o
 obj-y				+= syscall_table.o syscall-stubs.o irq.o
-obj-y				+= setup.o traps.o semaphore.o ocd.o ptrace.o
+obj-y				+= setup.o traps.o ocd.o ptrace.o
 obj-y				+= signal.o sys_avr32.o process.o time.o
 obj-y				+= init_task.o switch_to.o cpu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)		+= module.o avr32_ksyms.o
diff --git a/arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 1e2705a..0000000
--- a/arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,148 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * AVR32 sempahore implementation.
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Atmel Corporation
- *
- * Based on linux/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
- *  Copyright (C) 1999 Linus Torvalds
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
-
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-#include <asm/atomic.h>
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
- * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
- * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping"
- * variable is a count of such acquires.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
- * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
- * needs to do something only if count was negative before
- * the increment operation.
- *
- * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected
- * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is
- * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
- * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
- * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
- * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-
-/*
- * Logic:
- *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
- *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
- *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
- *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure
- *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
- *    we cannot lose wakeup events.
- */
-
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
-
-void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-        DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-        unsigned long flags;
-
-        tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-        spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-        add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-        sem->sleepers++;
-        for (;;) {
-                int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-                /*
-                 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-                 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-                 * the wait_queue_head.
-                 */
-                if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
-                        sem->sleepers = 0;
-                        break;
-                }
-                sem->sleepers = 1;      /* us - see -1 above */
-                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-                schedule();
-
-                spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-                tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-        }
-        remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-        wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-        tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	int retval = 0;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-        DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-        unsigned long flags;
-
-        tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-        spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-        add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-        sem->sleepers++;
-        for (;;) {
-                int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * With signals pending, this turns into the trylock
-		 * failure case - we won't be sleeping, and we can't
-		 * get the lock as it has contention. Just correct the
-		 * count and exit.
-		 */
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			retval = -EINTR;
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
-			break;
-		}
-
-                /*
-                 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-                 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-                 * the wait_queue_head.
-                 */
-                if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
-                        sem->sleepers = 0;
-                        break;
-                }
-                sem->sleepers = 1;      /* us - see -1 above */
-                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-                schedule();
-
-                spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-                tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-        }
-        remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-        wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-        tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	return retval;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
diff --git a/arch/blackfin/Kconfig b/arch/blackfin/Kconfig
index 589c6ac..2dd1f30 100644
--- a/arch/blackfin/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/blackfin/Kconfig
@@ -31,10 +31,6 @@ config ZONE_DMA
 	bool
 	default y
 
-config SEMAPHORE_SLEEPERS
-	bool
-	default y
-
 config GENERIC_FIND_NEXT_BIT
 	bool
 	default y
diff --git a/arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_ksyms.c b/arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_ksyms.c
index 0bfbb26..053edff 100644
--- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_ksyms.c
@@ -42,11 +42,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_fast_csum);
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_thread);
 
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_trylock);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_in_rom);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bfin_return_from_exception);
 
diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/Makefile b/arch/cris/kernel/Makefile
index c8e8ea5..ee7bcd4 100644
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/cris/kernel/Makefile
@@ -5,8 +5,7 @@
 
 extra-y	:= vmlinux.lds
 
-obj-y   := process.o traps.o irq.o ptrace.o setup.o \
-	   time.o sys_cris.o semaphore.o
+obj-y   := process.o traps.o irq.o ptrace.o setup.o time.o sys_cris.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)    += crisksyms.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)	 += module.o
diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c b/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c
index 62f0e75..7ac000f 100644
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c
+++ b/arch/cris/kernel/crisksyms.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/tty.h>
 
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/checksum.h>
@@ -49,12 +48,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__negdi2);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ioremap);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iounmap);
 
-/* Semaphore functions */
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_trylock);
-
 /* Userspace access functions */
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user_zeroing);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user);
diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/cris/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index f137a43..0000000
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,129 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  Generic semaphore code. Buyer beware. Do your own
- * specific changes in <asm/semaphore-helper.h>
- */
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore-helper.h>
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
- * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
- * that tries to sleep, while the "waking" variable is
- * incremented when the "up()" code goes to wake up waiting
- * processes.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
- * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
- * needs to do something only if count was negative before
- * the increment operation.
- *
- * waking_non_zero() (from asm/semaphore.h) must execute
- * atomically.
- *
- * When __up() is called, the count was negative before
- * incrementing it, and we need to wake up somebody.
- *
- * This routine adds one to the count of processes that need to
- * wake up and exit.  ALL waiting processes actually wake up but
- * only the one that gets to the "waking" field first will gate
- * through and acquire the semaphore.  The others will go back
- * to sleep.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is
- * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
- * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
- * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
- * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_one_more(sem);
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-/*
- * Perform the "down" function.  Return zero for semaphore acquired,
- * return negative for signalled out of the function.
- *
- * If called from __down, the return is ignored and the wait loop is
- * not interruptible.  This means that a task waiting on a semaphore
- * using "down()" cannot be killed until someone does an "up()" on
- * the semaphore.
- *
- * If called from __down_interruptible, the return value gets checked
- * upon return.  If the return value is negative then the task continues
- * with the negative value in the return register (it can be tested by
- * the caller).
- *
- * Either form may be used in conjunction with "up()".
- *
- */
-
-#define DOWN_VAR				\
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;	\
-	wait_queue_t wait;			\
-	init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, tsk);
-
-#define DOWN_HEAD(task_state)						\
-									\
-									\
-	tsk->state = (task_state);					\
-	add_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);				\
-									\
-	/*								\
-	 * Ok, we're set up.  sem->count is known to be less than zero	\
-	 * so we must wait.						\
-	 *								\
-	 * We can let go the lock for purposes of waiting.		\
-	 * We re-acquire it after awaking so as to protect		\
-	 * all semaphore operations.					\
-	 *								\
-	 * If "up()" is called before we call waking_non_zero() then	\
-	 * we will catch it right away.  If it is called later then	\
-	 * we will have to go through a wakeup cycle to catch it.	\
-	 *								\
-	 * Multiple waiters contend for the semaphore lock to see	\
-	 * who gets to gate through and who has to wait some more.	\
-	 */								\
-	for (;;) {
-
-#define DOWN_TAIL(task_state)			\
-		tsk->state = (task_state);	\
-	}					\
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;		\
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	DOWN_VAR
-	DOWN_HEAD(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-	if (waking_non_zero(sem))
-		break;
-	schedule();
-	DOWN_TAIL(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-}
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	int ret = 0;
-	DOWN_VAR
-	DOWN_HEAD(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
-
-	ret = waking_non_zero_interruptible(sem, tsk);
-	if (ret)
-	{
-		if (ret == 1)
-			/* ret != 0 only if we get interrupted -arca */
-			ret = 0;
-		break;
-	}
-	schedule();
-	DOWN_TAIL(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
-	return ret;
-}
-
-int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	return waking_non_zero_trylock(sem);
-}
diff --git a/arch/frv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/frv/kernel/Makefile
index e8f73ed..c36f70b 100644
--- a/arch/frv/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/frv/kernel/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ extra-y:= head.o init_task.o vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-y := $(heads-y) entry.o entry-table.o break.o switch_to.o kernel_thread.o \
 	 kernel_execve.o process.o traps.o ptrace.o signal.o dma.o \
-	 sys_frv.o time.o semaphore.o setup.o frv_ksyms.o \
+	 sys_frv.o time.o setup.o frv_ksyms.o \
 	 debug-stub.o irq.o sleep.o uaccess.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_GDBSTUB)		+= gdb-stub.o gdb-io.o
diff --git a/arch/frv/kernel/frv_ksyms.c b/arch/frv/kernel/frv_ksyms.c
index f772704..0316b3c 100644
--- a/arch/frv/kernel/frv_ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/frv/kernel/frv_ksyms.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
 #include <asm/checksum.h>
 #include <asm/hardirq.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
diff --git a/arch/frv/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/frv/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 7ee3a14..0000000
--- a/arch/frv/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,155 +0,0 @@
-/* semaphore.c: FR-V semaphores
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2003 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- * Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com)
- * - Derived from lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
- * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
- */
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-
-struct sem_waiter {
-	struct list_head	list;
-	struct task_struct	*task;
-};
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
-void semtrace(struct semaphore *sem, const char *str)
-{
-	if (sem->debug)
-		printk("[%d] %s({%d,%d})\n",
-		       current->pid,
-		       str,
-		       sem->counter,
-		       list_empty(&sem->wait_list) ? 0 : 1);
-}
-#else
-#define semtrace(SEM,STR) do { } while(0)
-#endif
-
-/*
- * wait for a token to be granted from a semaphore
- * - entered with lock held and interrupts disabled
- */
-void __down(struct semaphore *sem, unsigned long flags)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	struct sem_waiter waiter;
-
-	semtrace(sem, "Entering __down");
-
-	/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
-	waiter.task = tsk;
-	get_task_struct(tsk);
-
-	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
-
-	/* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	/* wait to be given the semaphore */
-	set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-
-	for (;;) {
-		if (list_empty(&waiter.list))
-			break;
-		schedule();
-		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-	}
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	semtrace(sem, "Leaving __down");
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
-
-/*
- * interruptibly wait for a token to be granted from a semaphore
- * - entered with lock held and interrupts disabled
- */
-int __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem, unsigned long flags)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	struct sem_waiter waiter;
-	int ret;
-
-	semtrace(sem,"Entering __down_interruptible");
-
-	/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
-	waiter.task = tsk;
-	get_task_struct(tsk);
-
-	list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
-
-	/* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
-	set_task_state(tsk, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	/* wait to be given the semaphore */
-	ret = 0;
-	for (;;) {
-		if (list_empty(&waiter.list))
-			break;
-		if (unlikely(signal_pending(current)))
-			goto interrupted;
-		schedule();
-		set_task_state(tsk, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-	}
-
- out:
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	semtrace(sem, "Leaving __down_interruptible");
-	return ret;
-
- interrupted:
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-
-	if (!list_empty(&waiter.list)) {
-		list_del(&waiter.list);
-		ret = -EINTR;
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
-	if (ret == -EINTR)
-		put_task_struct(current);
-	goto out;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
-
-/*
- * release a single token back to a semaphore
- * - entered with lock held and interrupts disabled
- */
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk;
-	struct sem_waiter *waiter;
-
-	semtrace(sem,"Entering __up");
-
-	/* grant the token to the process at the front of the queue */
-	waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct sem_waiter, list);
-
-	/* We must be careful not to touch 'waiter' after we set ->task = NULL.
-	 * It is allocated on the waiter's stack and may become invalid at
-	 * any time after that point (due to a wakeup from another source).
-	 */
-	list_del_init(&waiter->list);
-	tsk = waiter->task;
-	mb();
-	waiter->task = NULL;
-	wake_up_process(tsk);
-	put_task_struct(tsk);
-
-	semtrace(sem,"Leaving __up");
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
diff --git a/arch/h8300/kernel/Makefile b/arch/h8300/kernel/Makefile
index 874f6ae..6c248c3 100644
--- a/arch/h8300/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/h8300/kernel/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 extra-y := vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-y := process.o traps.o ptrace.o irq.o \
-	 sys_h8300.o time.o semaphore.o signal.o \
+	 sys_h8300.o time.o signal.o \
          setup.o gpio.o init_task.o syscalls.o \
 	 entry.o
 
diff --git a/arch/h8300/kernel/h8300_ksyms.c b/arch/h8300/kernel/h8300_ksyms.c
index d1b1526..6866bd9 100644
--- a/arch/h8300/kernel/h8300_ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/h8300/kernel/h8300_ksyms.c
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
 #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
 #include <asm/checksum.h>
 #include <asm/current.h>
 #include <asm/gpio.h>
diff --git a/arch/h8300/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/h8300/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index d12cbbf..0000000
--- a/arch/h8300/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,132 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  Generic semaphore code. Buyer beware. Do your own
- * specific changes in <asm/semaphore-helper.h>
- */
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore-helper.h>
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_RMW_INSNS
-spinlock_t semaphore_wake_lock;
-#endif
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
- * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
- * that tries to sleep, while the "waking" variable is
- * incremented when the "up()" code goes to wake up waiting
- * processes.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
- * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
- * needs to do something only if count was negative before
- * the increment operation.
- *
- * waking_non_zero() (from asm/semaphore.h) must execute
- * atomically.
- *
- * When __up() is called, the count was negative before
- * incrementing it, and we need to wake up somebody.
- *
- * This routine adds one to the count of processes that need to
- * wake up and exit.  ALL waiting processes actually wake up but
- * only the one that gets to the "waking" field first will gate
- * through and acquire the semaphore.  The others will go back
- * to sleep.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is
- * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
- * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
- * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
- * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_one_more(sem);
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-/*
- * Perform the "down" function.  Return zero for semaphore acquired,
- * return negative for signalled out of the function.
- *
- * If called from __down, the return is ignored and the wait loop is
- * not interruptible.  This means that a task waiting on a semaphore
- * using "down()" cannot be killed until someone does an "up()" on
- * the semaphore.
- *
- * If called from __down_interruptible, the return value gets checked
- * upon return.  If the return value is negative then the task continues
- * with the negative value in the return register (it can be tested by
- * the caller).
- *
- * Either form may be used in conjunction with "up()".
- *
- */
-
-
-#define DOWN_HEAD(task_state)						\
-									\
-									\
-	current->state = (task_state);					\
-	add_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);				\
-									\
-	/*								\
-	 * Ok, we're set up.  sem->count is known to be less than zero	\
-	 * so we must wait.						\
-	 *								\
-	 * We can let go the lock for purposes of waiting.		\
-	 * We re-acquire it after awaking so as to protect		\
-	 * all semaphore operations.					\
-	 *								\
-	 * If "up()" is called before we call waking_non_zero() then	\
-	 * we will catch it right away.  If it is called later then	\
-	 * we will have to go through a wakeup cycle to catch it.	\
-	 *								\
-	 * Multiple waiters contend for the semaphore lock to see	\
-	 * who gets to gate through and who has to wait some more.	\
-	 */								\
-	for (;;) {
-
-#define DOWN_TAIL(task_state)			\
-		current->state = (task_state);	\
-	}					\
-	current->state = TASK_RUNNING;		\
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-
-	DOWN_HEAD(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-	if (waking_non_zero(sem))
-		break;
-	schedule();
-	DOWN_TAIL(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-}
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	DOWN_HEAD(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
-
-	ret = waking_non_zero_interruptible(sem, current);
-	if (ret)
-	{
-		if (ret == 1)
-			/* ret != 0 only if we get interrupted -arca */
-			ret = 0;
-		break;
-	}
-	schedule();
-	DOWN_TAIL(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
-	return ret;
-}
-
-int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	return waking_non_zero_trylock(sem);
-}
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/ia64/kernel/Makefile
index 33e5a59..13fd10e 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ extra-y	:= head.o init_task.o vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-y := acpi.o entry.o efi.o efi_stub.o gate-data.o fsys.o ia64_ksyms.o irq.o irq_ia64.o	\
 	 irq_lsapic.o ivt.o machvec.o pal.o patch.o process.o perfmon.o ptrace.o sal.o		\
-	 salinfo.o semaphore.o setup.o signal.o sys_ia64.o time.o traps.o unaligned.o \
+	 salinfo.o setup.o signal.o sys_ia64.o time.o traps.o unaligned.o \
 	 unwind.o mca.o mca_asm.o topology.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_IA64_BRL_EMU)	+= brl_emu.o
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c
index 8e7193d..6da1f20 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/ia64_ksyms.c
@@ -19,12 +19,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(empty_zero_page);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_fast_csum);		/* hand-coded assembly */
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_ipv6_magic);
 
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_trylock);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
-
 #include <asm/page.h>
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page);
 
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 2724ef3..0000000
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,165 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * IA-64 semaphore implementation (derived from x86 version).
- *
- * Copyright (C) 1999-2000, 2002 Hewlett-Packard Co
- *	David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
- */
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter: The "count"
- * variable is decremented for each process that tries to acquire the
- * semaphore, while the "sleepers" variable is a count of such
- * acquires.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can efficiently
- * test if they need to do any extra work (up needs to do something
- * only if count was negative before the increment operation.
- *
- * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected
- * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is contention
- * on the lock, and as such all this is the "non-critical" part of the
- * whole semaphore business. The critical part is the inline stuff in
- * <asm/semaphore.h> where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-
-#include <asm/errno.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-
-/*
- * Logic:
- *  - Only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
- *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
- *  - When we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
- *    (a) synchronize with the "sleepers" count and (b) make sure
- *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
- *    we cannot lose wakeup events.
- */
-
-void
-__up (struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-void __sched __down (struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	sem->sleepers++;
-	for (;;) {
-		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-		 * the wait_queue_head.
-		 */
-		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-		schedule();
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-		tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-}
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible (struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	int retval = 0;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	sem->sleepers ++;
-	for (;;) {
-		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * With signals pending, this turns into
-		 * the trylock failure case - we won't be
-		 * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as
-		 * it has contention. Just correct the count
-		 * and exit.
-		 */
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			retval = -EINTR;
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-		 * wait_queue_head. The "-1" is because we're
-		 * still hoping to get the semaphore.
-		 */
-		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-		schedule();
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	return retval;
-}
-
-/*
- * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for having decremented the
- * count.
- */
-int
-__down_trylock (struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int sleepers;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1;
-	sem->sleepers = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't
-	 * playing, because we own the spinlock in the
-	 * wait_queue_head.
-	 */
-	if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) {
-		wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	return 1;
-}
diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile b/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile
index e97e26e..09200d4 100644
--- a/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/m32r/kernel/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 extra-y	:= head.o init_task.o vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-y	:= process.o entry.o traps.o align.o irq.o setup.o time.o \
-	m32r_ksyms.o sys_m32r.o semaphore.o signal.o ptrace.o
+	m32r_ksyms.o sys_m32r.o signal.o ptrace.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP)		+= smp.o smpboot.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)		+= module.o
diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c
index 41a4c95..e6709fe 100644
--- a/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/m32r/kernel/m32r_ksyms.c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/checksum.h>
@@ -22,10 +21,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_fpu);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ioremap);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iounmap);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_thread);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_trylock);
 
 /* Networking helper routines. */
 /* Delay loops */
diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 940c2d3..0000000
--- a/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,185 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  linux/arch/m32r/semaphore.c
- *    orig : i386 2.6.4
- *
- *  M32R semaphore implementation.
- *
- *	Copyright (c) 2002 - 2004 Hitoshi Yamamoto
- */
-
-/*
- * i386 semaphore implementation.
- *
- * (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds
- *
- * Portions Copyright 1999 Red Hat, Inc.
- *
- *	This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
- *	modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
- *	as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
- *	2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
- *
- * rw semaphores implemented November 1999 by Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
- */
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
- * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
- * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping"
- * variable is a count of such acquires.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
- * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
- * needs to do something only if count was negative before
- * the increment operation.
- *
- * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected
- * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is
- * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
- * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
- * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
- * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-
-/*
- * Logic:
- *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
- *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
- *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
- *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure
- *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
- *    we cannot lose wakeup events.
- */
-
-asmlinkage void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-asmlinkage void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	sem->sleepers++;
-	for (;;) {
-		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-		 * the wait_queue_head.
-		 */
-		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-		schedule();
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-		tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-}
-
-asmlinkage int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	int retval = 0;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-	sem->sleepers++;
-	for (;;) {
-		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * With signals pending, this turns into
-		 * the trylock failure case - we won't be
-		 * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as
-		 * it has contention. Just correct the count
-		 * and exit.
-		 */
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			retval = -EINTR;
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-		 * wait_queue_head. The "-1" is because we're
-		 * still hoping to get the semaphore.
-		 */
-		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			break;
-		}
-		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-		schedule();
-
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-	}
-	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	return retval;
-}
-
-/*
- * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for
- * having decremented the count.
- *
- * We could have done the trylock with a
- * single "cmpxchg" without failure cases,
- * but then it wouldn't work on a 386.
- */
-asmlinkage int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	int sleepers;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1;
-	sem->sleepers = 0;
-
-	/*
-	 * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't
-	 * playing, because we own the spinlock in the
-	 * wait_queue_head.
-	 */
-	if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) {
-		wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-	return 1;
-}
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile b/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile
index a806208..7a62a71 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/Makefile
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ endif
 extra-y	+= vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-y	:= entry.o process.o traps.o ints.o signal.o ptrace.o module.o \
-	   sys_m68k.o time.o semaphore.o setup.o m68k_ksyms.o devres.o
+	   sys_m68k.o time.o setup.o m68k_ksyms.o devres.o
 
 devres-y = ../../../kernel/irq/devres.o
 
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c
index 6fc69c7..d900e77 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
 
 asmlinkage long long __ashldi3 (long long, int);
 asmlinkage long long __ashrdi3 (long long, int);
@@ -15,8 +14,3 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashrdi3);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__muldi3);
 
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed_interruptible);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_failed_trylock);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up_wakeup);
-
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index d12cbbf..0000000
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,132 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  Generic semaphore code. Buyer beware. Do your own
- * specific changes in <asm/semaphore-helper.h>
- */
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore-helper.h>
-
-#ifndef CONFIG_RMW_INSNS
-spinlock_t semaphore_wake_lock;
-#endif
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
- * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
- * that tries to sleep, while the "waking" variable is
- * incremented when the "up()" code goes to wake up waiting
- * processes.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
- * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
- * needs to do something only if count was negative before
- * the increment operation.
- *
- * waking_non_zero() (from asm/semaphore.h) must execute
- * atomically.
- *
- * When __up() is called, the count was negative before
- * incrementing it, and we need to wake up somebody.
- *
- * This routine adds one to the count of processes that need to
- * wake up and exit.  ALL waiting processes actually wake up but
- * only the one that gets to the "waking" field first will gate
- * through and acquire the semaphore.  The others will go back
- * to sleep.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is
- * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
- * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
- * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
- * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_one_more(sem);
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-
-/*
- * Perform the "down" function.  Return zero for semaphore acquired,
- * return negative for signalled out of the function.
- *
- * If called from __down, the return is ignored and the wait loop is
- * not interruptible.  This means that a task waiting on a semaphore
- * using "down()" cannot be killed until someone does an "up()" on
- * the semaphore.
- *
- * If called from __down_interruptible, the return value gets checked
- * upon return.  If the return value is negative then the task continues
- * with the negative value in the return register (it can be tested by
- * the caller).
- *
- * Either form may be used in conjunction with "up()".
- *
- */
-
-
-#define DOWN_HEAD(task_state)						\
-									\
-									\
-	current->state = (task_state);					\
-	add_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);				\
-									\
-	/*								\
-	 * Ok, we're set up.  sem->count is known to be less than zero	\
-	 * so we must wait.						\
-	 *								\
-	 * We can let go the lock for purposes of waiting.		\
-	 * We re-acquire it after awaking so as to protect		\
-	 * all semaphore operations.					\
-	 *								\
-	 * If "up()" is called before we call waking_non_zero() then	\
-	 * we will catch it right away.  If it is called later then	\
-	 * we will have to go through a wakeup cycle to catch it.	\
-	 *								\
-	 * Multiple waiters contend for the semaphore lock to see	\
-	 * who gets to gate through and who has to wait some more.	\
-	 */								\
-	for (;;) {
-
-#define DOWN_TAIL(task_state)			\
-		current->state = (task_state);	\
-	}					\
-	current->state = TASK_RUNNING;		\
-	remove_wait_queue(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-
-	DOWN_HEAD(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-	if (waking_non_zero(sem))
-		break;
-	schedule();
-	DOWN_TAIL(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
-}
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	DOWN_HEAD(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
-
-	ret = waking_non_zero_interruptible(sem, current);
-	if (ret)
-	{
-		if (ret == 1)
-			/* ret != 0 only if we get interrupted -arca */
-			ret = 0;
-		break;
-	}
-	schedule();
-	DOWN_TAIL(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
-	return ret;
-}
-
-int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem)
-{
-	return waking_non_zero_trylock(sem);
-}
diff --git a/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile b/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile
index 6bbf19f..a18af09 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/m68k/lib/Makefile
@@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
 EXTRA_AFLAGS := -traditional
 
 lib-y	:= ashldi3.o ashrdi3.o lshrdi3.o muldi3.o \
-	   checksum.o string.o semaphore.o uaccess.o
+	   checksum.o string.o uaccess.o
diff --git a/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S b/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
deleted file mode 100644
index 0215624..0000000
--- a/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  linux/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
- *
- *  Copyright (C) 1996  Linus Torvalds
- *
- *  m68k version by Andreas Schwab
- */
-
-#include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-
-/*
- * The semaphore operations have a special calling sequence that
- * allow us to do a simpler in-line version of them. These routines
- * need to convert that sequence back into the C sequence when
- * there is contention on the semaphore.
- */
-ENTRY(__down_failed)
-	moveml %a0/%d0/%d1,-(%sp)
-	movel %a1,-(%sp)
-	jbsr __down
-	movel (%sp)+,%a1
-	moveml (%sp)+,%a0/%d0/%d1
-	rts
-
-ENTRY(__down_failed_interruptible)
-	movel %a0,-(%sp)
-	movel %d1,-(%sp)
-	movel %a1,-(%sp)
-	jbsr __down_interruptible
-	movel (%sp)+,%a1
-	movel (%sp)+,%d1
-	movel (%sp)+,%a0
-	rts
-
-ENTRY(__down_failed_trylock)
-	movel %a0,-(%sp)
-	movel %d1,-(%sp)
-	movel %a1,-(%sp)
-	jbsr __down_trylock
-	movel (%sp)+,%a1
-	movel (%sp)+,%d1
-	movel (%sp)+,%a0
-	rts
-
-ENTRY(__up_wakeup)
-	moveml %a0/%d0/%d1,-(%sp)
-	movel %a1,-(%sp)
-	jbsr __up
-	movel (%sp)+,%a1
-	moveml (%sp)+,%a0/%d0/%d1
-	rts
-
diff --git a/arch/m68knommu/kernel/Makefile b/arch/m68knommu/kernel/Makefile
index 1524b39..f0eab3d 100644
--- a/arch/m68knommu/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/m68knommu/kernel/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 extra-y := vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-y += dma.o entry.o init_task.o irq.o m68k_ksyms.o process.o ptrace.o \
-	 semaphore.o setup.o signal.o syscalltable.o sys_m68k.o time.o traps.o
+	 setup.o signal.o syscalltable.o sys_m68k.o time.o traps.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)	+= module.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_COMEMPCI)	+= comempci.o
diff --git a/arch/m68knommu/kernel/m68k_ksyms.c