Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jens Axboe
Date: Thursday, March 13, 2008 - 8:00 am

On Thu, Mar 13 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:

Good!


Sometimes I find that the __init and friends need some include magic to
actually work, even if it compiles and links just fine. If you could
pick at it a bit once the benchmark is out of the way, that would be
great. This is a fine work-around for now.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Wed Mar 12, 4:55 am)
[PATCH 3/7] x86: add fast smp_call_function_single(), Jens Axboe, (Wed Mar 12, 4:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Alan D. Brunelle, (Wed Mar 12, 9:41 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Wed Mar 12, 10:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Max Krasnyanskiy, (Wed Mar 12, 1:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 13, 5:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Alan D. Brunelle, (Thu Mar 13, 7:54 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] IO CPU affinity testing series, Jens Axboe, (Thu Mar 13, 8:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86-64: introduce fast variant of smp_call ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Mar 14, 11:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86-64: introduce fast variant of smp_call ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Mar 16, 3:58 pm)