Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » March » 13

Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Pekka Enberg
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
Date: Thursday, March 13, 2008 - 5:48 am

Hi Alan,

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

Do you honestly think we should be polite to people trolling on the
LKML? The problem with kill-filing people like J.C. Pizzarro (a known
troll on the GCC mailing list at least) is that other people will
engange in discussing these "proposals" and contribute in generating
noise anyway.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, J.C. Pizarro, (Wed Mar 12, 1:09 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Al Viro, (Wed Mar 12, 2:12 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Rik van Riel, (Wed Mar 12, 2:22 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Al Viro, (Wed Mar 12, 2:32 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Wed Mar 12, 10:57 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Mar 12, 11:12 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Wed Mar 12, 11:22 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Mar 13, 12:38 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Mar 13, 2:10 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 3:50 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 4:02 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 4:04 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Alan Cox, (Thu Mar 13, 5:10 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, J.C. Pizarro, (Thu Mar 13, 5:23 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Mar 13, 5:48 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, J.C. Pizarro, (Thu Mar 13, 6:55 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 12:40 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Mar 13, 1:05 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Al Viro, (Thu Mar 13, 3:50 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Mar 13, 11:05 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Stephen Clark, (Fri Mar 14, 5:11 am)