On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:31 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Only if X is not getting CPU for long periods without swapping would I
become suspicious of the scheduler. We recently had exactly this
trouble with the fair groups load balancing code (now reverted) and CPU
bound loads. The bug is a symptom of latency woes, and the scheduler is
just one potential source worth watching. In the heavy swapping case,
it's unlikely to be scheduler trouble, and yes, the bug lies elsewhere.
-Mike
--