Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski
Date: Thursday, March 13, 2008 - 3:06 am

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote:


Yes, it fixes all _3_ startup warnings and lets the machine reboot and 
power off again. 3 warnings are the 2 reported as a regression from 
2.6.24, and one present also under 2.6.24:

PCI: Probing PCI hardware
sysfs: duplicate filename 'bridge' can not be created
WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-hires-nohz #2
 [<c010541a>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
 [<c0105ed2>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
 [<c010675e>] dump_stack+0x6e/0x80
 [<c01b246d>] sysfs_add_one+0x9d/0xe0
 [<c01b328b>] sysfs_create_link+0x8b/0x130
 [<c01f9f14>] pci_bus_add_devices+0x94/0x120
 [<c03f3920>] pci_legacy_init+0x50/0xf0
 [<c03d95f2>] kernel_init+0x142/0x320
 [<c0104fe3>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
 =======================
pci 0000:00:01.0: Error creating sysfs bridge symlink, continuing...

So, well done! I was going to disturb you with that one after 2.6.25, now 
I don't have to any more, unless we want it fixed in 2.6.24-stable.


always at your disposal:-)

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Mar 10, 4:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Mar 10, 5:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Mar 10, 6:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Mar 10, 7:15 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 10, 8:00 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Mar 11, 1:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Stefan Richter, (Tue Mar 11, 5:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Mar 11, 6:04 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Mar 11, 11:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Mar 11, 3:41 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Linus Torvalds, (Wed Mar 12, 1:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Greg KH, (Wed Mar 12, 1:32 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Christian Kujau, (Wed Mar 12, 3:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Wed Mar 12, 4:01 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ..., Guennadi Liakhovetski, (Wed Mar 12, 4:17 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ..., Guennadi Liakhovetski, (Wed Mar 12, 4:32 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ..., Guennadi Liakhovetski, (Wed Mar 12, 4:47 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, David Chinner, (Wed Mar 12, 10:03 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ..., Guennadi Liakhovetski, (Thu Mar 13, 3:06 am)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6. ..., Guennadi Liakhovetski, (Thu Mar 13, 3:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Mar 13, 2:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Jeff Garzik, (Mon Mar 17, 12:20 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Thomas Meyer, (Mon Mar 17, 2:28 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24, Stefan Richter, (Wed Mar 19, 2:15 am)