login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
March
»
13
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Yinghai Lu
Subject:
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24)
Date: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 - 11:24 pm
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:09:17PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > I can't get a box here to produce both of those PCI: messages myself, > > > and neither can Len, so something is really odd here. > > Ok, stupid me, this was my fault. I was assuming that pci busses would > never be registered multiple times with the pci core. Obviously this > isn't true. The previous patch I proposed was only paying attention to > the PCI devices, and that logic is just fine (it's already protected > when it is attempted to be registered multiple times.) > > So, the patch below fixes the issue for me, and reboot seems to work as > well. > > Guennadi, can you test this out on your machine? > > thanks for your patience, > > greg k-h > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > Subject: PCI: fix issue with busses registering multiple times in sysfs > > PCI busses can be registered multiple times, so we need to detect if we > have registered our bus structure in sysfs already. If so, don't do it > again. > > Thanks to Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> for reporting > the problem, and to Linus for poking me to get me to believe that it was > a real problem. > > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
wonder if
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=commitdiff;h=fff0747...
helps. YH --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Mon Mar 10, 4:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Jeff Garzik
, (Mon Mar 10, 5:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Mon Mar 10, 6:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Linus Torvalds
, (Mon Mar 10, 7:15 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Mar 10, 8:00 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Mar 11, 1:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Stefan Richter
, (Tue Mar 11, 5:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Adrian Bunk
, (Tue Mar 11, 6:04 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Mar 11, 11:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Tue Mar 11, 3:41 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Mar 12, 1:01 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 1:32 pm)
pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25- ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 2:27 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 2:38 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Len Brown
, (Wed Mar 12, 2:41 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Christian Kujau
, (Wed Mar 12, 3:12 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Mar 12, 3:20 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Mar 12, 3:25 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 3:34 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 3:54 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:01 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:02 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:09 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:16 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Guennadi Liakhovetski
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:17 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Guennadi Liakhovetski
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:32 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:35 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:37 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:37 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Guennadi Liakhovetski
, (Wed Mar 12, 4:47 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 9:48 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, David Chinner
, (Wed Mar 12, 10:03 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Wed Mar 12, 10:44 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6. ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Wed Mar 12, 11:24 pm)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Guennadi Liakhovetski
, (Thu Mar 13, 3:06 am)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6. ...
, Guennadi Liakhovetski
, (Thu Mar 13, 3:07 am)
Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6 ...
, Greg KH
, (Thu Mar 13, 8:32 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Rafael J. Wysocki
, (Thu Mar 13, 2:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Jeff Garzik
, (Mon Mar 17, 12:20 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Thomas Meyer
, (Mon Mar 17, 2:28 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.24
, Stefan Richter
, (Wed Mar 19, 2:15 am)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Stefan Richter
Re: sata & scsi suggestion for make menuconfig
Rafael J. Wysocki
[Bug #11409] build issue #564 for v2.6.27-rc4 : undefined reference to `NS8390p_in...
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 20/36] Driver core: Call device_pm_add() after bus_add_device() in device_a...
Marcin Slusarz
Re: [PATCH] ufs: [bl]e*_add_cpu conversion
Andrew Morton
2.6.23-rc6-mm1
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: git-svnimport
Anuj Gakhar
Git Architecture Question
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH] Fix approxidate("never") to always return 0
A Large Angry SCM
Re: [RFC] origin link for cherry-pick and revert
Gabriel
[PATCH] When a remote is added but not fetched, tell the user.
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
v2 [PATCH 1/4] dccp: Limit feature negotiation to connection setup phase
Daniel Lezcano
getsockopt(TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT) value change
David Miller
Re: 2.6.27.18: bnx2/tg3: BUG: "scheduling while atomic" trying to ifenslave a seco...
Ingo Molnar
Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 37/37] dccp: Debugging functions for feature negotiation
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ath9k_htc: Allocate URBs properly
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[ARM] dma: use new dmabounce_sync_for_xxx() for dma_sync_single_xxx()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: Cavium: Remove unused watchdog code.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (8976): af9015: Add USB ID for AVerMedia A309
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: 5670/1: bcmring: add default configuration for bcmring arch
openbsd-misc
:
Christophe Rioux
Implementation example of snmp
Jason Dixon
Re: any web management gui for pf ?
Nick Holland
Re: booting openbsd on eee without cd-rom
Bryan Irvine
Re: OpenBSD 4.7 Released, May 19 2010
Marco Peereboom
Re: Singularity OS
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate