Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » March » 13

Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: David Newall
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
Date: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 - 10:57 pm

Al Viro wrote:

You really are being rude and insulting.  Unnecessarily so.  Maybe
you're just recalcitrant (in the sense that President Suharto inferred,
not the sense that Prime Minister Keating meant.)
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, J.C. Pizarro, (Wed Mar 12, 1:09 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Al Viro, (Wed Mar 12, 2:12 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Rik van Riel, (Wed Mar 12, 2:22 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Al Viro, (Wed Mar 12, 2:32 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Wed Mar 12, 10:57 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Mike Galbraith, (Wed Mar 12, 11:12 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Wed Mar 12, 11:22 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Christoph Hellwig, (Thu Mar 13, 12:38 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Mar 13, 2:10 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 3:50 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 4:02 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 4:04 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Alan Cox, (Thu Mar 13, 5:10 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, J.C. Pizarro, (Thu Mar 13, 5:23 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Mar 13, 5:48 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, J.C. Pizarro, (Thu Mar 13, 6:55 am)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, David Newall, (Thu Mar 13, 12:40 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Mar 13, 1:05 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Al Viro, (Thu Mar 13, 3:50 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Willy Tarreau, (Thu Mar 13, 11:05 pm)
Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance, Stephen Clark, (Fri Mar 14, 5:11 am)