Daniel Phillips wrote:By "recover well", you must mean "loses massive swabs of data, leaving the system unbootable and with enormous numbers of user files missing." My experience. Expecting fsck to cover for missed writes is stupid. --
| Junio C Hamano | [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.6.0 |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdb: Merkey's Linux Kernel Debugger 2.6.27-rc4 released |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Paul Menage | Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/7] Account for the number of tasks within container |
git: | |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Scott Chacon | Git Community Book |
| Greg KH | Re: [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT |
| Lars Hjemli | [PATCH] git-merge: add option --no-ff |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Nick Guenther | Re: Real men don't attack straw men |
| Travers Buda | Re: Important OpenBSD errata |
| Gregory Edigarov | How to re-build openssl with SHA1 support? |
| Al Boldi | [RFC] VM: I have a dream... |
| Dave Kleikamp | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Jörn | Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three) |
| Chris Mason | [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs v0.12 released |
