Paul M wrote:
quoted text
> Not cgroups, no. If you really wanted to extend cpusets specifically
> to allow irqs to be assigned to a cpuset to control which cpus they
> could execute on, then that might be a possibility. But I don't see
> how this would be useful for any other cgroup subsystem, so it doesn't
> belong in the generic framework.

Ok - a sensible decision.

quoted text
> My feeling is that just using a simple bitmask assignment, unrelated
> to cpusets or cgroups, as Max suggested in his later email is the way
> to go.

I'll have to have another go at reading his replies.  I seem to have
more difficulty making sense of his posts ... not sure why.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/