Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Rik van Riel

Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus

Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 - 7:07 am

On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:18:24 -0400
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org> wrote:

quoted text> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 14:03 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > SysRQ-P is not always useful on SMP systems, since it usually ends up showing the
> > backtrace of a CPU that is doing just fine, instead of the backtrace of the CPU
> > that is having problems.
> > 
> > This patch adds SysRQ show-all-cpus(L), which shows the backtrace of every active
> > CPU in the system.  It skips idle CPUs because some SMP systems are just too large
> > and we already know what the backtrace of the idle task looks like.
> >  
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> 
> Why not have it just print the local CPU on non-SMP anyway?

Sysrq p already does exactly that.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Rik van Riel, (Mon Mar 10, 10:32 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Andrew Morton, (Mon Mar 10, 10:41 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Mar 10, 10:46 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Rik van Riel, (Mon Mar 10, 10:57 am)

[PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Rik van Riel, (Mon Mar 10, 11:03 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Randy Dunlap, (Mon Mar 10, 11:09 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Jon Masters, (Tue Mar 11, 12:18 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Nick Piggin, (Tue Mar 11, 1:12 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Rik van Riel, (Tue Mar 11, 7:07 am)

Re: [PATCH] sysrq show-all-cpus, Jon Masters, (Tue Mar 11, 8:06 am)


linux-kernel:
Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]	2.6.21.5 june 30th to july 1st date hang?
Jeff Dike	[ PATCH 2/6 ] UML - Formatting fixes around os_{read_write}_file callers
Liam Girdwood	[PATCH 07/13] regulator: regulator test harness
Oleg Nesterov	Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream
Stefan Seyfried	Re: 2.6.19-rc5: grub is much slower resuming from suspend-to-disk than in 2.6.18
linux-netdev:
Arnaud Ebalard	Re: [REGRESSION,BISECTED] MIPv6 support broken by f4f914b58019f0
Jan Engelhardt	Re: [PATCH iptables] extension: add xt_cpu match
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior	[PATCH 8/8] net/emergency: remove locking from reycling pool if emergncy pools are...
David Miller	Re: [PATCH] qlcnic: dont assume NET_IP_ALIGN is 2
git:
Jakub Narebski	Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Brandon Casey	Re: Thunderbird and patches (was Re: [PATCH v2] Enable setting attach as the def...
Christian Couder	[PATCH 1/3] rev-parse: add test script for "--verify"
Ramkumar Ramachandra	Re: [GSoC update] git-remote-svn: The final one
Junio C Hamano	Re: git-rm isn't the inverse action of git-add
openbsd-misc:
Joachim Schipper	Re: UVC Webcams
Florin Andrei	SOLVED [was: firewall is very slow, something's wrong]
Todd Alan Smith	Re: Microsoft gets the Most Secure Operating Systems award
Neal Hogan	Re: Need Advice: Thinkpad T60 or T61?
Sam Fourman Jr.	Re: Real men don't attack straw men
git-commits-head:
Linux Kernel Mailing List	ACPI: Disable ARB_DISABLE on platforms where it is not needed
Linux Kernel Mailing List	m68knommu: add read_barrier_depends() and irqs_disabled_flags()
Linux Kernel Mailing List	[MTD] Add mtd panic_write function pointer
Linux Kernel Mailing List	[ARM] pxa: remove duplicate select statements from Kconfig
Linux Kernel Mailing List	mlx4_core: Don't read reserved fields in mlx4_QUERY_ADAPTER()