login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
March
»
11
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "calculation"
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Roland McGrath
Subject:
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "calculation"
Date: Monday, March 10, 2008 - 7:19 pm
> For various reasons we can't currently do the same for sig_kernel_coredump()
quoted text
> signals. But, when rlim[RLIMIT_CORE] == 0, we don't actually need coredumping? > So, we could do something like > > > - if (!sig_kernel_coredump(sig)) { > + if (!sig_kernel_coredump(sig) || !signal->rlim[RLIMIT_CORE]) {
I don't like this. I think it's better to leave logic like RLIMIT_CORE checks to the core dump code itself. Thanks, Roland --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the signr "c ...
, Oleg Nesterov
, (Sat Mar 8, 10:24 am)
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the sign ...
, Roland McGrath
, (Sat Mar 8, 12:03 pm)
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the sign ...
, Oleg Nesterov
, (Sat Mar 8, 1:30 pm)
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the sign ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Sun Mar 9, 4:05 am)
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the sign ...
, Oleg Nesterov
, (Sun Mar 9, 9:11 am)
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the sign ...
, Roland McGrath
, (Mon Mar 10, 7:19 pm)
Re: [RFC, PATCH] signals: print_fatal_signal: fix the sign ...
, Oleg Nesterov
, (Tue Mar 11, 11:22 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
monstr
[PATCH 46/56] microblaze_v2: headers files entry.h current.h mman.h registers.h se...
Jan Engelhardt
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
Dave Jones
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Michael Moore
Re: underage models, pre teen models, lolita porn, young preteens, little lolitas
Lars-Peter Clausen
[PATCH v4] MMC: Add JZ4740 mmc driver
git
:
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Eli Zaretskii
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Jan Harkes
Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
Dan Chokola
Re: how do you "force a pull"?
Johan Herland
Re: Comment on weak refs
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: SMTC: Fix lockup in smtc_distribute_timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh-sci: update receive error handling for muxed irqs
linux-netdev
:
Patrick McHardy
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Ilpo Järvinen
net-next/unix: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
Herbert Xu
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Evgeniy Polyakov
Re: virt-manager broken by bind(0) in net-next.
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH] conntrack: use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU for nf_conn structs
openbsd-misc
:
elitdostlar
Seks partneri arayan bayanlar bu adreste - 8878xs706x6438
Marcus Andree
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Lars D. Noodén
Re: sshd.config and AllowUsers
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Laurens Vets
Re: OT: opinions on IDS / IPS solutions
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate