> So now you can ask some hard questions: what if the power goes out 
quoted text
> completely or the host crashes or something else goes wrong while 
> critical data is still in the ramdisk?  Easy: use reliable components.  

Nice fiction - stuff crashes eventually - not that this isn't useful. For
a long time simply loading a 2-3GB Ramdisk off hard disk has been a good
way to build things like compile engines where loss of state is not bad.

quoted text
> If UPS power runs out while ramback still holds unflushed dirty data 
> then things get ugly.  Hopefully a fsck -f will be able to pull 
> something useful out of the mess.  (This is where you might want to be 
> running Ext3.)  The name of the game is to install sufficient UPS power 
> to get your dirty ramdisk data onto stable storage this time, every 
> time.

Ext3 is only going to help you if the ramdisk writeback respects barriers
and ordering rules ?

quoted text
>  * Previously saved data must be reloaded into the ramdisk on startup.

/bin/cp from initrd

quoted text
>  * Cannot transfer directly between ramdisk and backing store, so must 
>    first transfer into memory then relaunch to destination.

Why not - providing you clear the dirty bit before the write and you
check it again after ? And on the disk size as you are going to have to
suck all the content back in presumably a log structure is not a big
concern ?

quoted text
>  * Per chunk locking is not feasible for a terabyte scale ramdisk.

And we care  8) ?

quoted text
>   * Handle chunk size other than PAGE_SIZE.

If you are prepared to go bigger than the fs chunk size so lose the
ordering guarantees your chunk size really ought to be *big* IMHO

Alan
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/