Re: [PATCH] [1/5] CPA: Split static_protections into required_static_prot and advised_static_prot

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...>, <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, February 9, 2008 - 1:09 pm

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

Right, you poked my nose to it. I did not think about it when I coded
it. It is wrong and needs to be fixed, but not by the range check you
introduced.
 

As far as I can tell it is more relaxed, as it will make overlapping
regions of rodata and rwdata completely rw instead of splitting it up.

Thanks,
	tglx
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] [1/5] CPA: Split static_protections into require..., Thomas Gleixner, (Sat Feb 9, 1:09 pm)